Why Movie Studios Care About Right of Publicity

Ben Sheffner
{"title":"Why Movie Studios Care About Right of Publicity","authors":"Ben Sheffner","doi":"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.1994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So why do movie studios care about the right of publicity? The answer is quite simple. Our studios make lots of movies and television programs about and inspired by real people and events. It is critical to our studios that they have the right to do that—whether or not the subjects of those movies and television shows want movies or television shows made about them. \nTo illustrate how important this issue is to our studios in present day, let me say a couple things. The word “copyright” is included in my job title. I am mostly a copyright lawyer, and I think that is why I was hired at the Motion Picture Association. But over the last two to three years, I have spent the majority of my time on right of publicity, more so than on issues involving copyright. My counterparts—the intellectual property lawyers in-house at the movie studios— consider court decisions threatening their right to make movies and television shows about and inspired by real people and events, without obtaining the subjects’ permission, “existential threats.” One of the things that Professor Jennifer Rothman mentioned in her remarks is that we need to do a better job articulating what the nature of this threat is, or what it means as a practical matter. Let me take up the baton and try to give you a sense of just how fundamentally important this issue is in current years.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.1994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

So why do movie studios care about the right of publicity? The answer is quite simple. Our studios make lots of movies and television programs about and inspired by real people and events. It is critical to our studios that they have the right to do that—whether or not the subjects of those movies and television shows want movies or television shows made about them. To illustrate how important this issue is to our studios in present day, let me say a couple things. The word “copyright” is included in my job title. I am mostly a copyright lawyer, and I think that is why I was hired at the Motion Picture Association. But over the last two to three years, I have spent the majority of my time on right of publicity, more so than on issues involving copyright. My counterparts—the intellectual property lawyers in-house at the movie studios— consider court decisions threatening their right to make movies and television shows about and inspired by real people and events, without obtaining the subjects’ permission, “existential threats.” One of the things that Professor Jennifer Rothman mentioned in her remarks is that we need to do a better job articulating what the nature of this threat is, or what it means as a practical matter. Let me take up the baton and try to give you a sense of just how fundamentally important this issue is in current years.
电影制片厂为什么关心形象权
那么,电影制片厂为什么要关心宣传权呢?答案很简单。我们的工作室制作了许多关于真实人物和事件的电影和电视节目,并受到其启发。对我们的电影公司来说,至关重要的是他们有权这样做——无论这些电影和电视节目的主题是否希望以他们为主题的电影或电视节目。为了说明这个问题对我们今天的工作室有多重要,我想说几件事。“版权”这个词包含在我的工作头衔里。我主要是一名版权律师,我想这就是我被美国电影协会聘用的原因。但在过去的两三年里,我把大部分时间都花在了宣传权上,而不是版权问题上。我的同行——电影制片厂内部的知识产权律师——认为法院的判决威胁到了他们在未经当事人许可的情况下制作关于真人真事并受其启发的电影和电视节目的权利,这是“生存威胁”。Jennifer Rothman教授在她的评论中提到的一件事是,我们需要更好地阐明这种威胁的本质是什么,或者它作为一个实际问题意味着什么。让我拿起指挥棒,试着让你们了解这个问题在当前是多么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信