Regulating in Pandemic: Evaluating Economic and Financial Policy Responses to the Coronavirus Crisis

Hiba Hafiz, Shu-Yi Oei, Diane M. Ring, Natalya Shnitser
{"title":"Regulating in Pandemic: Evaluating Economic and Financial Policy Responses to the Coronavirus Crisis","authors":"Hiba Hafiz, Shu-Yi Oei, Diane M. Ring, Natalya Shnitser","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3555980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States is currently trying to manage a fast-moving public health crisis due to the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19). The economic and financial ramifications of the outbreak are serious. This Working Paper discusses these ramifications and identifies three interrelated but potentially conflicting policy priorities at stake in managing the economic and financial fallout of the COVID-19 crisis: (1) providing social insurance and a social safety net to individuals and families in need; (2) managing systemic economic and financial risk; and (3) encouraging critical spatial behaviors to help contain COVID-19 transmission. The confluence of these three policy considerations and the potential conflicts among them make the outbreak a significant and unique regulatory challenge for policymakers, and one for which the consequences of getting it wrong are dire. \n \nThis Working Paper — which will be continually updated to reflect current developments — will analyze the major legislative and other policy initiatives that are being proposed and enacted to manage the economic and financial aspects of the COVID-19 crisis by examining these initiatives through the lens of these three policy priorities. It starts by analyzing the provisions of H.R. 6201 (the “Families First Coronavirus Responses Act”) passed by the house on March 14, 2020, subject to subsequent Technical Corrections of March 16, 2020, and then passed by the Senate without amendment and signed by the President on March 18, 2020. Next, it analyzes the provisions of H.R. 748 (the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” or the “CARES” Act) enacted into law on March 27, 2020. By doing so, this Working Paper provides an analytical framework for evaluating these initiatives.","PeriodicalId":262144,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The United States is currently trying to manage a fast-moving public health crisis due to the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19). The economic and financial ramifications of the outbreak are serious. This Working Paper discusses these ramifications and identifies three interrelated but potentially conflicting policy priorities at stake in managing the economic and financial fallout of the COVID-19 crisis: (1) providing social insurance and a social safety net to individuals and families in need; (2) managing systemic economic and financial risk; and (3) encouraging critical spatial behaviors to help contain COVID-19 transmission. The confluence of these three policy considerations and the potential conflicts among them make the outbreak a significant and unique regulatory challenge for policymakers, and one for which the consequences of getting it wrong are dire. This Working Paper — which will be continually updated to reflect current developments — will analyze the major legislative and other policy initiatives that are being proposed and enacted to manage the economic and financial aspects of the COVID-19 crisis by examining these initiatives through the lens of these three policy priorities. It starts by analyzing the provisions of H.R. 6201 (the “Families First Coronavirus Responses Act”) passed by the house on March 14, 2020, subject to subsequent Technical Corrections of March 16, 2020, and then passed by the Senate without amendment and signed by the President on March 18, 2020. Next, it analyzes the provisions of H.R. 748 (the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” or the “CARES” Act) enacted into law on March 27, 2020. By doing so, this Working Paper provides an analytical framework for evaluating these initiatives.
大流行中的监管:评估应对冠状病毒危机的经济和金融政策
美国目前正在努力应对因冠状病毒(COVID-19)爆发而迅速蔓延的公共卫生危机。疫情的经济和财政后果是严重的。本工作文件讨论了这些后果,并确定了在管理2019冠状病毒病危机的经济和金融影响方面面临的三个相互关联但可能相互冲突的政策重点:(1)为有需要的个人和家庭提供社会保险和社会安全网;(2)管理系统性经济金融风险;(3)鼓励关键的空间行为,以帮助遏制COVID-19的传播。这三种政策考虑的汇合以及它们之间的潜在冲突,使疫情成为政策制定者面临的重大而独特的监管挑战,而错误的后果是可怕的。本工作文件将不断更新,以反映当前的事态发展。本工作文件将分析为管理COVID-19危机的经济和金融方面而提出和颁布的主要立法和其他政策举措,并从这三个政策重点的角度审视这些举措。首先分析众议院于2020年3月14日通过的H.R. 6201(“家庭第一冠状病毒应对法案”)的条款,随后在2020年3月16日进行技术修正,然后在参议院未经修改通过,并于2020年3月18日由总统签署。接下来,它分析了2020年3月27日颁布的H.R. 748(“冠状病毒援助,救济和经济安全法案”或“关怀法案”)的规定。通过这样做,本工作文件为评估这些计划提供了一个分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信