Exploratory Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Supporting Failure Prediction

João R. Campos, M. Vieira, E. Costa
{"title":"Exploratory Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Supporting Failure Prediction","authors":"João R. Campos, M. Vieira, E. Costa","doi":"10.1109/EDCC.2018.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing complexity of software makes it difficult or even impossible to detect all faults before deployment, and such residual faults eventually lead to failures at runtime. Online Failure Prediction (OFP) is a technique that attempts to avoid or mitigate such failures by predicting their occurrence based on the analysis of past data and the current state of a system. Given recent technological developments, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have shown their ability to adapt and extract knowledge in a variety of complex problems, and thus have been used for OFP. Still, they are highly dependent on the problem at hand, and their performance can be influenced by different factors. The problem with most works using ML for OFP is that they focus only on a small set of prediction algorithms and techniques, although there is no comprehensive study to support their choice. In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis of various ML algorithms and techniques on a dataset containing failure data. The results show that, for the same data, different algorithms and techniques directly influence the prediction performance and thus should be carefully selected.","PeriodicalId":129399,"journal":{"name":"2018 14th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 14th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2018.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

The growing complexity of software makes it difficult or even impossible to detect all faults before deployment, and such residual faults eventually lead to failures at runtime. Online Failure Prediction (OFP) is a technique that attempts to avoid or mitigate such failures by predicting their occurrence based on the analysis of past data and the current state of a system. Given recent technological developments, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have shown their ability to adapt and extract knowledge in a variety of complex problems, and thus have been used for OFP. Still, they are highly dependent on the problem at hand, and their performance can be influenced by different factors. The problem with most works using ML for OFP is that they focus only on a small set of prediction algorithms and techniques, although there is no comprehensive study to support their choice. In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis of various ML algorithms and techniques on a dataset containing failure data. The results show that, for the same data, different algorithms and techniques directly influence the prediction performance and thus should be carefully selected.
支持故障预测的机器学习技术探索性研究
软件越来越复杂,在部署之前很难甚至不可能检测到所有的故障,而这些残留的故障最终会导致运行时的故障。在线故障预测(OFP)是一种基于对过去数据和系统当前状态的分析,通过预测故障的发生,试图避免或减轻此类故障的技术。鉴于最近的技术发展,机器学习(ML)算法已经显示出其在各种复杂问题中适应和提取知识的能力,因此已被用于OFP。尽管如此,它们仍然高度依赖于手头的问题,并且它们的性能可能受到不同因素的影响。大多数使用ML进行OFP的工作的问题是,他们只关注一小部分预测算法和技术,尽管没有全面的研究来支持他们的选择。在本文中,我们在包含故障数据的数据集上对各种ML算法和技术进行了探索性分析。结果表明,对于相同的数据,不同的算法和技术会直接影响预测效果,因此需要慎重选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信