Comparison of dyad training method with cooperative and competitive approach in the learning of Basketball Free Throw

Shahab Parvin poor, Mitra Roohi, Fatemeh Rad
{"title":"Comparison of dyad training method with cooperative and competitive approach in the learning of Basketball Free Throw","authors":"Shahab Parvin poor, Mitra Roohi, Fatemeh Rad","doi":"10.29252/jrsm.9.17.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to Comparison of dyad training method with cooperative and competitive approach in the learning of Basketball Free Throw. The study sample included 24 girl’s students aged 13-15 years old who had no experience in free throw. Based on pretest scores, the participants were assigned to either the cooperative dyad training group or the competitive dyad training group. In the competitive dyad training condition, individuals in each dyad had to compete with each other to secure the highest free throw score. At the end of each training session the winner was rewarded. In contrast, in the cooperative dyad training condition, the dyads that attained the score of 75 or more in each training session were rewarded. After the 10th training session, the acquisition of free throw skill was assessed. A week later, the retention and the transfer of free throw skill were assessed. The results indicated that, with regard to the acquisition of free throw skill, in both conditions the participants had made statistically significant progress. In terms of the acquisition and the retention of the target skill, no statistically significant differences were observed between cooperative and competitive training groups. However, with regard to transfer test, the cooperative training group outperformed the competitive training group. Therefore, in comparison to competitive dyad training, cooperative dyad training is more conducive to the acquisition and the retention of free throw skill.","PeriodicalId":228665,"journal":{"name":"Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/jrsm.9.17.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to Comparison of dyad training method with cooperative and competitive approach in the learning of Basketball Free Throw. The study sample included 24 girl’s students aged 13-15 years old who had no experience in free throw. Based on pretest scores, the participants were assigned to either the cooperative dyad training group or the competitive dyad training group. In the competitive dyad training condition, individuals in each dyad had to compete with each other to secure the highest free throw score. At the end of each training session the winner was rewarded. In contrast, in the cooperative dyad training condition, the dyads that attained the score of 75 or more in each training session were rewarded. After the 10th training session, the acquisition of free throw skill was assessed. A week later, the retention and the transfer of free throw skill were assessed. The results indicated that, with regard to the acquisition of free throw skill, in both conditions the participants had made statistically significant progress. In terms of the acquisition and the retention of the target skill, no statistically significant differences were observed between cooperative and competitive training groups. However, with regard to transfer test, the cooperative training group outperformed the competitive training group. Therefore, in comparison to competitive dyad training, cooperative dyad training is more conducive to the acquisition and the retention of free throw skill.
双人训练法与合作竞争训练法在篮球罚球学习中的比较
本研究旨在比较合作与竞争两种训练方法在篮球罚球学习中的作用。研究样本包括24名13-15岁的没有罚球经验的女生。根据测试前的分数,参与者被分配到合作组和竞争组。在竞争性双人组训练条件下,每个双人组中的个人必须相互竞争以确保罚球得分最高。每次训练结束时,获胜者都会得到奖励。相比之下,在合作组训练条件下,每次训练得分达到75分或以上的组得到奖励。第10次训练结束后,对罚球技能的习得情况进行评估。一周后,再进行罚球技能的保留和转移。结果表明,关于罚球技巧的习得,在两种情况下,参与者都取得了统计学上显著的进步。在目标技能的习得和保留方面,合作性训练组和竞技性训练组之间无统计学差异。然而,在迁移测试方面,合作训练组优于竞争训练组。因此,与竞争性对位训练相比,合作性对位训练更有利于罚球技能的习得和保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信