A comparison of NER tools w.r.t. a domain-specific vocabulary

Timm Heuss, B. Humm, Christian Henninger, Thomas Rippl
{"title":"A comparison of NER tools w.r.t. a domain-specific vocabulary","authors":"Timm Heuss, B. Humm, Christian Henninger, Thomas Rippl","doi":"10.1145/2660517.2660520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare several state-of-the-art Linked Data Knowledge Extraction tools, with regard to their ability to recognise entities of a controlled, domain-specific vocabulary. This includes tools that offer APIs as a Service, locally installed platforms as well as an UIMA-based approach as reference. We evaluate under realistic conditions, with natural language source texts from keywording experts of the Städel Museum Frankfurt. The goal is to find first hints which tool approach or strategy is more convincing in case of a domain specific tagging/annotation, towards a working solution that is demanded by GLAMs world-wide.","PeriodicalId":344435,"journal":{"name":"Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2660517.2660520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this paper we compare several state-of-the-art Linked Data Knowledge Extraction tools, with regard to their ability to recognise entities of a controlled, domain-specific vocabulary. This includes tools that offer APIs as a Service, locally installed platforms as well as an UIMA-based approach as reference. We evaluate under realistic conditions, with natural language source texts from keywording experts of the Städel Museum Frankfurt. The goal is to find first hints which tool approach or strategy is more convincing in case of a domain specific tagging/annotation, towards a working solution that is demanded by GLAMs world-wide.
NER工具与特定于领域的词汇表的比较
在本文中,我们比较了几种最先进的关联数据知识提取工具,关于它们识别受控实体的能力,特定于领域的词汇表。这包括提供api即服务的工具、本地安装的平台以及作为参考的基于uma的方法。我们在现实条件下进行评估,使用来自Städel法兰克福博物馆关键字专家的自然语言源文本。我们的目标是找到在特定领域的标记/注释的情况下,哪种工具方法或策略更令人信服的第一个线索,以实现全球GLAMs所要求的工作解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信