Medical Evaluative Research and Privacy Protection

J. Sliwa, Emmanuel Benoist
{"title":"Medical Evaluative Research and Privacy Protection","authors":"J. Sliwa, Emmanuel Benoist","doi":"10.1109/DeSE.2013.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of data protection in medical research regards various communities, among them: patients, doctors, approval authorities, researchers, technology suppliers, privacy protectors and lawyers. Therefore it can be seen from many perspectives. In particular, it seems to be common to underestimate the inherent difficulty of obtaining the scientific basis for evaluating health technology and taking decisions about its efficient use. It is important to promote the dialog between the aforementioned communities in order to optimize the overall benefit of the patient. This problem ultimately leads to an ethical dilemma and has no simple solution. In this paper, we try to provide a balanced view of the problem, showing the trade-offs and helping to take responsible decisions. As representatives of the information technology, we also propose a technical solution that permits to collect data necessary for research and minimizing the risk of its loss.","PeriodicalId":248716,"journal":{"name":"2013 Sixth International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Sixth International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2013.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The problem of data protection in medical research regards various communities, among them: patients, doctors, approval authorities, researchers, technology suppliers, privacy protectors and lawyers. Therefore it can be seen from many perspectives. In particular, it seems to be common to underestimate the inherent difficulty of obtaining the scientific basis for evaluating health technology and taking decisions about its efficient use. It is important to promote the dialog between the aforementioned communities in order to optimize the overall benefit of the patient. This problem ultimately leads to an ethical dilemma and has no simple solution. In this paper, we try to provide a balanced view of the problem, showing the trade-offs and helping to take responsible decisions. As representatives of the information technology, we also propose a technical solution that permits to collect data necessary for research and minimizing the risk of its loss.
医学评估研究与隐私保护
医学研究中的数据保护问题涉及各个群体,其中包括:患者、医生、审批机构、研究人员、技术供应商、隐私保护者和律师。因此,它可以从许多角度来看。特别是,人们似乎普遍低估了获得科学基础以评价卫生技术并就其有效使用作出决定的固有困难。重要的是促进上述社区之间的对话,以优化患者的整体利益。这个问题最终导致一个道德困境,没有简单的解决办法。在本文中,我们试图提供一个平衡的观点来看待这个问题,展示权衡并帮助做出负责任的决定。作为信息技术的代表,我们也提出了一种技术解决方案,可以收集研究所需的数据,并将数据丢失的风险降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信