Telehealth continence education classes: a feasible alternative to in-person classes

M. Collings, R. Brennen
{"title":"Telehealth continence education classes: a feasible alternative to in-person classes","authors":"M. Collings, R. Brennen","doi":"10.33235/anzcj.28.4.84-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many group education sessions provided by healthcare services during 2020 were transitioned to telehealth. Research evaluating the delivery of group continence education via telehealth is limited. To investigate the feasibility of telehealth continence education, we conducted a retrospective audit of telehealth classes from July to December 2020 and in-person continence education classes from July to December 2018. We compared client attendance to classes, demographic data including age and distance lived from the clinic, feedback survey responses, and time spent by staff organising and conducting the classes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative survey responses were analysed to identify key feedback. The non-attendance rate for the telehealth classes was 32% (n=13) compared to 35% (n=26) for the in-person classes. Feedback for the telehealth classes was positive, with 73% of survey respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that it was easy to join the session. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the telehealth classes were interesting compared to 94% of respondents for the in-person classes. Lack of access to, or familiarity with, technology were limiting factors for telehealth class attendance. Telehealth therefore appears to be a feasible modality for the delivery of continence education classes, with comparable attendance rates to in-person classes. However, access to technology may be a barrier to attendance for some clients and telehealth classes may be more time consuming for clinicians.","PeriodicalId":320388,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33235/anzcj.28.4.84-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many group education sessions provided by healthcare services during 2020 were transitioned to telehealth. Research evaluating the delivery of group continence education via telehealth is limited. To investigate the feasibility of telehealth continence education, we conducted a retrospective audit of telehealth classes from July to December 2020 and in-person continence education classes from July to December 2018. We compared client attendance to classes, demographic data including age and distance lived from the clinic, feedback survey responses, and time spent by staff organising and conducting the classes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative survey responses were analysed to identify key feedback. The non-attendance rate for the telehealth classes was 32% (n=13) compared to 35% (n=26) for the in-person classes. Feedback for the telehealth classes was positive, with 73% of survey respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that it was easy to join the session. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the telehealth classes were interesting compared to 94% of respondents for the in-person classes. Lack of access to, or familiarity with, technology were limiting factors for telehealth class attendance. Telehealth therefore appears to be a feasible modality for the delivery of continence education classes, with comparable attendance rates to in-person classes. However, access to technology may be a barrier to attendance for some clients and telehealth classes may be more time consuming for clinicians.
远程保健自制教育课程:面对面课程的可行替代方案
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,2020年期间卫生保健服务机构提供的许多小组教育课程都转向了远程医疗。评估通过远程医疗提供群体自制教育的研究有限。为了探讨远程医疗控制教育的可行性,我们对2020年7月至12月的远程医疗课程和2018年7月至12月的现场控制教育课程进行了回顾性审核。我们比较了客户上课的出勤率、人口统计数据(包括年龄和离诊所的距离)、反馈调查结果以及工作人员组织和指导课程所花费的时间。定量资料采用描述性统计进行分析。定性调查的回应进行分析,以确定关键的反馈。远程医疗课程的缺勤率为32% (n=13),而面对面课程的缺勤率为35% (n=26)。对远程保健课程的反馈是积极的,73%的调查受访者同意或强烈同意参加课程很容易。所有答复者都同意或强烈同意,远程保健课程很有趣,而94%的答复者认为面对面的课程很有趣。缺乏获取或不熟悉技术是远程保健课程出勤率的限制因素。因此,远程保健似乎是提供自制教育课程的一种可行方式,其出勤率与面对面课程相当。然而,获得技术可能是一些客户出勤的障碍,远程保健课程对临床医生来说可能更耗时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信