Subject of escape from places of deprivation of Liberty, detention or protection and its signs

A.B. Baisultanov
{"title":"Subject of escape from places of deprivation of Liberty, detention or protection and its signs","authors":"A.B. Baisultanov","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-160-169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the subject of escape from places of deprivation of liberty, from arrest or from custody, criminal liability for committing is provided for by Art. 426 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and its features. In addition, criminal liability is associated with the fact that it is considered as a subject only if there is a sign of a natural person, the person’s ability, during the commission of a socially dangerous act, to realize the actual nature and social danger of his actions (inaction) or to control them. Contains a full criminal law meaning about the mandatory signs of a subject who has committed a criminal offense. The controversial points of view of domestic and foreign legal scholars on various problems of this topic are analyzed, the author’s recommendations are offered. The types of the subject of a criminal offense, the definition of signs of a general and special subject are also set forth. The questions about the sign of reaching age are considered. The importance of distinguishing between sanity and insanity is considered. Proposals are given on the qualification of the escape of servicemen who have committed from the places of arrest, and the reduction of the age of the subject of the escape under aggravating circumstances. It is noted that only persons who have been taken in full compliance with the requirements of the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Laws to temporary detention centers, pre-trial detention centers, or institutions of deprivation of liberty and who have escaped from them are prosecuted for escape.","PeriodicalId":300299,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-160-169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the subject of escape from places of deprivation of liberty, from arrest or from custody, criminal liability for committing is provided for by Art. 426 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and its features. In addition, criminal liability is associated with the fact that it is considered as a subject only if there is a sign of a natural person, the person’s ability, during the commission of a socially dangerous act, to realize the actual nature and social danger of his actions (inaction) or to control them. Contains a full criminal law meaning about the mandatory signs of a subject who has committed a criminal offense. The controversial points of view of domestic and foreign legal scholars on various problems of this topic are analyzed, the author’s recommendations are offered. The types of the subject of a criminal offense, the definition of signs of a general and special subject are also set forth. The questions about the sign of reaching age are considered. The importance of distinguishing between sanity and insanity is considered. Proposals are given on the qualification of the escape of servicemen who have committed from the places of arrest, and the reduction of the age of the subject of the escape under aggravating circumstances. It is noted that only persons who have been taken in full compliance with the requirements of the Criminal and Criminal Procedure Laws to temporary detention centers, pre-trial detention centers, or institutions of deprivation of liberty and who have escaped from them are prosecuted for escape.
逃离剥夺自由、拘留或保护场所的对象及其迹象
该条专门讨论从剥夺自由地点、从逮捕或拘留地点逃跑的问题,《哈萨克斯坦共和国刑法》第426条规定了犯罪的刑事责任及其特点。此外,刑事责任还与以下事实相关联,即只有自然人在实施社会危险行为过程中,能够意识到其行为(不作为)的实际性质和社会危险,或者能够控制其行为的能力,才被视为主体。包含了犯罪主体的强制标志的完整刑法意义。分析了国内外法律学者对这一主题的各种问题的争议观点,并提出了笔者的建议。对犯罪主体的类型、一般主体标志和特殊主体标志的定义进行了阐述。关于达到年龄的迹象的问题被考虑。考虑到区分理智和精神错乱的重要性。关于从逮捕地点犯罪的军人逃跑的资格,以及在加重情况下降低逃跑主体的年龄,提出了建议。委员会指出,只有完全按照《刑事和刑事诉讼法》的要求被带到临时拘留中心、审前拘留中心或剥夺自由机构并从这些机构逃脱的人才会因逃跑而受到起诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信