A Semi-Analytical Model for the Prediction of CO2 Injectivity into Saline Aquifers or Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs

T. Whittle, P. Park, C. Coll
{"title":"A Semi-Analytical Model for the Prediction of CO2 Injectivity into Saline Aquifers or Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs","authors":"T. Whittle, P. Park, C. Coll","doi":"10.2118/209628-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As carbon dioxide (CO2) is injected into a reservoir (for CO2 sequestration in a saline aquifer or depleted reservoir, or even for enhanced oil recovery in the case of a less depleted reservoir), a region around the well becomes saturated and expands with time. From a pressure transient perspective, by making some simple assumptions the resulting reservoir configuration at any given moment can be approximated by a two-region radial composite system. As well as its radial extent, the inner region is defined by its diffusivity and mobility, both of which differ from those of the outer region as a result of the CO2 saturation. The CO2 viscosity and compressibility at reservoir pressure and temperature are the essential properties that impact the diffusivity and mobility. Knowing the three variables, radius, diffusivity ratio and mobility ratio, the constant rate pressure transient response is readily computed from existing analytical radial composite model solutions. These are commonly used in the petroleum industry to analyse well test behaviour and can be configured with a variety of boundary conditions (no flow, constant pressure or infinite, usually in the shape of a rectangle).\n The problem with CO2 injection is that the radius and properties of the inner zone vary with time and hence any single radial composite model does not apply. The solution approach in this paper is to apply superposition. At each discretised time step, the well is simultaneously injected at a constant rate assuming the current configuration and shut in with the previous configuration. The shut-in \"cancels out\" the previous model and the current model applies. At each time step, the injected volume is calculated, the material balance and associated reservoir pressure computed along with the new inner zone radius, diffusivity and mobility and hence the model for the next time step is defined. An additional iterative loop allows for the injection rate to decrease if the injection pressure exceeds a maximum constraint.\n The method is simple and fast and appears to match the pressure response of numerical simulations of the same problem using more detailed physics, without the associated noisy derivative often associated with grid-based solutions. It implicitly assumes a piston like displacement which results in an unrealistic saturation profile that differs from the more rigorous numerical models where gravity and capillary effects are included. However, comparisons with such models indicate that the prediction of well pressure and hence injectivity is sufficiently accurate for practical purposes despite this approximation.\n The application of superposition in time - a method usually associated with solving linear problems – is demonstrated to adequately solve the complex non-linear problem of CO2 injectivity and, because the method includes material balance, it can help to define storage efficiency factors which are critical for the evaluation of storage capacity.","PeriodicalId":311361,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 08, 2022","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 08, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209628-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As carbon dioxide (CO2) is injected into a reservoir (for CO2 sequestration in a saline aquifer or depleted reservoir, or even for enhanced oil recovery in the case of a less depleted reservoir), a region around the well becomes saturated and expands with time. From a pressure transient perspective, by making some simple assumptions the resulting reservoir configuration at any given moment can be approximated by a two-region radial composite system. As well as its radial extent, the inner region is defined by its diffusivity and mobility, both of which differ from those of the outer region as a result of the CO2 saturation. The CO2 viscosity and compressibility at reservoir pressure and temperature are the essential properties that impact the diffusivity and mobility. Knowing the three variables, radius, diffusivity ratio and mobility ratio, the constant rate pressure transient response is readily computed from existing analytical radial composite model solutions. These are commonly used in the petroleum industry to analyse well test behaviour and can be configured with a variety of boundary conditions (no flow, constant pressure or infinite, usually in the shape of a rectangle). The problem with CO2 injection is that the radius and properties of the inner zone vary with time and hence any single radial composite model does not apply. The solution approach in this paper is to apply superposition. At each discretised time step, the well is simultaneously injected at a constant rate assuming the current configuration and shut in with the previous configuration. The shut-in "cancels out" the previous model and the current model applies. At each time step, the injected volume is calculated, the material balance and associated reservoir pressure computed along with the new inner zone radius, diffusivity and mobility and hence the model for the next time step is defined. An additional iterative loop allows for the injection rate to decrease if the injection pressure exceeds a maximum constraint. The method is simple and fast and appears to match the pressure response of numerical simulations of the same problem using more detailed physics, without the associated noisy derivative often associated with grid-based solutions. It implicitly assumes a piston like displacement which results in an unrealistic saturation profile that differs from the more rigorous numerical models where gravity and capillary effects are included. However, comparisons with such models indicate that the prediction of well pressure and hence injectivity is sufficiently accurate for practical purposes despite this approximation. The application of superposition in time - a method usually associated with solving linear problems – is demonstrated to adequately solve the complex non-linear problem of CO2 injectivity and, because the method includes material balance, it can help to define storage efficiency factors which are critical for the evaluation of storage capacity.
含盐含水层或衰竭油气藏CO2注入预测的半解析模型
当将二氧化碳(CO2)注入储层(在含盐含水层或衰竭油藏中封存二氧化碳,甚至在衰竭程度较低的油藏中提高采收率)时,井周围的区域会变得饱和,并随着时间的推移而膨胀。从压力瞬变的角度来看,通过做一些简单的假设,可以用两区径向复合系统近似地得到任意时刻的储层结构。除了径向范围外,内部区域还由其扩散率和迁移率来定义,由于CO2饱和度的影响,这两项指标与外部区域不同。在储层压力和温度下,CO2的粘度和可压缩性是影响扩散率和流动性的基本性质。已知半径、扩散比和流度比这三个变量,可以很容易地从现有的解析径向复合模型解中计算出恒速压力瞬态响应。这些工具在石油工业中通常用于分析试井行为,并且可以配置各种边界条件(无流动、恒压或无限,通常为矩形)。二氧化碳注入的问题在于,内部区域的半径和性质随时间而变化,因此任何单一的径向复合模型都不适用。本文的求解方法是应用叠加。在每个离散时间步长,假设当前配置,井同时以恒定速率注入,并以先前配置关井。关闭“取消”之前的模型,并应用当前模型。在每个时间步,计算注入体积,计算物质平衡和相关的油藏压力,以及新的内层半径、扩散率和流度,从而定义下一个时间步的模型。如果注入压力超过最大限制,则额外的迭代循环允许注入速率降低。该方法简单、快速,似乎与使用更详细的物理方法对同一问题进行的数值模拟的压力响应相匹配,而没有网格解中经常出现的相关噪声导数。它隐含地假设了一个类似活塞的位移,这导致了一个不现实的饱和剖面,这与包括重力和毛细效应的更严格的数值模型不同。然而,与这些模型的比较表明,尽管这种近似,但对于实际目的来说,井压和注入能力的预测仍然足够准确。应用时间叠加-一种通常与解决线性问题相关的方法-被证明可以充分解决复杂的CO2注入率非线性问题,并且由于该方法包括物质平衡,它可以帮助定义存储效率因素,这对于评估存储容量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书