ALTERNATIVE NUMERICAL SIMULATION APPROACH FOR OBTAINING FLC/FLD

S. Di̇kmenli̇
{"title":"ALTERNATIVE NUMERICAL SIMULATION APPROACH FOR OBTAINING FLC/FLD","authors":"S. Di̇kmenli̇","doi":"10.55696/ejset.1212311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be able to predict the forming behavior of sheet metal parts by simulation, it is necessary to determine the FLD1 (Forming Limit Diagram) curves of the sheet material that is subjected to bending, hemming, deep drawing, progressive forming, embossing, hydro-forming processes. To determine such curves, the usual practice is to carry out a series of experiments that need to be repeated many times, and therefore it takes a long time to finalize them [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Not to mention undertaken experiments are very detailed and need tedious and careful work has to be done such as screen printing on the material and doing simultaneous optical measurements during the experiments. Indeed, a fully equipped laboratory and qualified lab personnel are required for such experiments which may not be easily found. When it's found, there is usually six months to a year, queue to conduct such experiments. \nBecause of these difficulties, many academic institutions and manufacturing sites develop their in-house test equipment if funding is available. If not, it is dependent on research whether it comes to an end or whether it can continue without it. \nAn alternative method developed for extracting FLD/FLC curves is using today’s state-of-the-art simulation technology. This method requires two main inputs; \na) Tensile test of the material \nb) An explicit solver \nThe scope of this paper is to detail this method such that the findings in this document can be reproduced when the mentioned requirements are satisfied. Therefore, all data used in charts, a high-resolution image, and a sample Abaqus input file are provided as supplemental data [7]. \nThe results from the simulations of FLD/FLC were compared to published literature [13] [14] to confirm their compliance with experiments. The comparison showed good results and demonstrates that expensive and time-consuming FLD/FLC experiments are not necessary when the mentioned requirements are met.","PeriodicalId":143980,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Science Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Science Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55696/ejset.1212311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To be able to predict the forming behavior of sheet metal parts by simulation, it is necessary to determine the FLD1 (Forming Limit Diagram) curves of the sheet material that is subjected to bending, hemming, deep drawing, progressive forming, embossing, hydro-forming processes. To determine such curves, the usual practice is to carry out a series of experiments that need to be repeated many times, and therefore it takes a long time to finalize them [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Not to mention undertaken experiments are very detailed and need tedious and careful work has to be done such as screen printing on the material and doing simultaneous optical measurements during the experiments. Indeed, a fully equipped laboratory and qualified lab personnel are required for such experiments which may not be easily found. When it's found, there is usually six months to a year, queue to conduct such experiments. Because of these difficulties, many academic institutions and manufacturing sites develop their in-house test equipment if funding is available. If not, it is dependent on research whether it comes to an end or whether it can continue without it. An alternative method developed for extracting FLD/FLC curves is using today’s state-of-the-art simulation technology. This method requires two main inputs; a) Tensile test of the material b) An explicit solver The scope of this paper is to detail this method such that the findings in this document can be reproduced when the mentioned requirements are satisfied. Therefore, all data used in charts, a high-resolution image, and a sample Abaqus input file are provided as supplemental data [7]. The results from the simulations of FLD/FLC were compared to published literature [13] [14] to confirm their compliance with experiments. The comparison showed good results and demonstrates that expensive and time-consuming FLD/FLC experiments are not necessary when the mentioned requirements are met.
获取flc / field的另一种数值模拟方法
为了能够通过模拟预测钣金件的成形行为,有必要确定板材材料在弯曲、封边、拉深、级进成形、压花、液压成形等过程中的FLD1(成形极限图)曲线。为了确定这样的曲线,通常的做法是进行一系列需要多次重复的实验,因此需要很长时间才能最终确定[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]。更不用说进行的实验非常详细,需要繁琐而仔细的工作,例如在材料上进行丝网印刷,并在实验期间进行同步光学测量。的确,进行这种不容易找到的实验需要一个设备齐全的实验室和合格的实验室人员。当它被发现时,通常需要六个月到一年的时间来进行这样的实验。由于这些困难,如果资金充足,许多学术机构和生产基地开发他们的内部测试设备。如果没有,则取决于研究它是否会结束,或者没有它是否可以继续。另一种用于提取FLD/FLC曲线的方法是使用当今最先进的仿真技术。这种方法需要两个主要输入;a)材料的拉伸试验b)显式求解器本文的范围是详细说明该方法,以便在满足上述要求时可以重现本文件中的结果。因此,图表中使用的所有数据、高分辨率图像和样例Abaqus输入文件作为补充数据[7]提供。将FLD/FLC的模拟结果与已发表的文献b[13][14]进行比较,以证实其与实验的一致性。结果表明,在满足上述要求的情况下,无需进行昂贵且耗时的FLD/FLC实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信