Counselor Education Online Curriculum Design: Social Justice Considerations

L. Mckenna, Amie A. Manis
{"title":"Counselor Education Online Curriculum Design: Social Justice Considerations","authors":"L. Mckenna, Amie A. Manis","doi":"10.22371/tces/0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of technology has gained considerable momentum in counselor education as more programs are being offered in full and partial online platforms (ACES Technology Interest Network, 2017; Snow & Coker, 2020). With the global pandemic beginning in 2020, many programs that had not yet offered online courses were challenged to quickly shift to an online format. This change provides an opportunity to carefully reflect on best practices in online course design and assessment at the student, class, and program level. When given the responsibility of designing a course for any mode of delivery, faculty may struggle with where to begin. There may be an inclination to find a good primary resource such as a reliable text, and then work from there developing lectures, study aids, and assignments. An alternative approach is to begin by thinking about the course learning outcomes, and what competencies students will need to develop and demonstrate once working in the field. Once the course outcomes are identified, an assessment plan including the formative and summative learning activities is the next design step. In order to promote deep learning and consistent student developmental progress, the instructional design must be well-conceptualized with each component intentionally built in to support the end result (Czersawski, 2014; Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). We aim to provide a brief illustration of the application of two models to support effective course design for online delivery of the counselor education curriculum. The first, which we have found especially wellsuited for counselor education, is competency-based education. Designing with competencies that align to the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) standards in the forefront, is also consonant with the second model, the backward design. This approach recognizes the importance of formative and summative assessments that are responsive to diverse learning styles and authentic to the field of practice (Alalshaikh, 2015; Moates & Cox, 2015). Further, the use of technology for full or partial delivery of a course or program curriculum presents the advantage of an embedded assessment strategy to support real-time generation of student learning outcomes (SLOs) data. This promotes opportunities for intervention at the student, course and program level (Akos, 2019). An example of how the approach can be applied to measuring competency development as a social justice advocate is offered. COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of distance learning in 2020 throughout the world. Online education is now central to counselor education and the trend will likely continue post COVID-19 as well. The history of distance education technology in counselor education is first explored and then the advantages and challenges of this learning model are discussed along with the ethical, legal and regulatory implications. Finally, the future of counselor education is explored along with emerging technologies that may again disrupt our teaching and learning models. Conference Proceedings","PeriodicalId":188478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22371/tces/0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of technology has gained considerable momentum in counselor education as more programs are being offered in full and partial online platforms (ACES Technology Interest Network, 2017; Snow & Coker, 2020). With the global pandemic beginning in 2020, many programs that had not yet offered online courses were challenged to quickly shift to an online format. This change provides an opportunity to carefully reflect on best practices in online course design and assessment at the student, class, and program level. When given the responsibility of designing a course for any mode of delivery, faculty may struggle with where to begin. There may be an inclination to find a good primary resource such as a reliable text, and then work from there developing lectures, study aids, and assignments. An alternative approach is to begin by thinking about the course learning outcomes, and what competencies students will need to develop and demonstrate once working in the field. Once the course outcomes are identified, an assessment plan including the formative and summative learning activities is the next design step. In order to promote deep learning and consistent student developmental progress, the instructional design must be well-conceptualized with each component intentionally built in to support the end result (Czersawski, 2014; Wiggins & McTighe, 2005). We aim to provide a brief illustration of the application of two models to support effective course design for online delivery of the counselor education curriculum. The first, which we have found especially wellsuited for counselor education, is competency-based education. Designing with competencies that align to the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) standards in the forefront, is also consonant with the second model, the backward design. This approach recognizes the importance of formative and summative assessments that are responsive to diverse learning styles and authentic to the field of practice (Alalshaikh, 2015; Moates & Cox, 2015). Further, the use of technology for full or partial delivery of a course or program curriculum presents the advantage of an embedded assessment strategy to support real-time generation of student learning outcomes (SLOs) data. This promotes opportunities for intervention at the student, course and program level (Akos, 2019). An example of how the approach can be applied to measuring competency development as a social justice advocate is offered. COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of distance learning in 2020 throughout the world. Online education is now central to counselor education and the trend will likely continue post COVID-19 as well. The history of distance education technology in counselor education is first explored and then the advantages and challenges of this learning model are discussed along with the ethical, legal and regulatory implications. Finally, the future of counselor education is explored along with emerging technologies that may again disrupt our teaching and learning models. Conference Proceedings
咨询师教育在线课程设计:社会公正考量
随着越来越多的课程在全部和部分在线平台上提供,技术的使用在咨询师教育中获得了相当大的动力(ACES技术兴趣网络,2017;Snow & Coker, 2020)。随着2020年全球大流行的开始,许多尚未提供在线课程的项目面临着迅速转向在线课程的挑战。这一变化为在学生、班级和项目层面仔细反思在线课程设计和评估的最佳实践提供了机会。当被赋予为任何教学模式设计课程的责任时,教师们可能会纠结于从哪里开始。他们可能会倾向于找到一个好的主要资源,比如一个可靠的文本,然后从那里开发讲座、学习辅助工具和作业。另一种方法是首先考虑课程的学习成果,以及学生在该领域工作后需要发展和展示的能力。一旦确定了课程成果,包括形成性和总结性学习活动的评估计划就是下一个设计步骤。为了促进深度学习和持续的学生发展进步,教学设计必须充分概念化,有意地将每个组件内建以支持最终结果(Czersawski, 2014;Wiggins & McTighe, 2005)。我们的目的是提供一个简单的说明,应用两种模式,以支持有效的课程设计,在线交付的辅导员教育课程。第一种,我们发现特别适合辅导员教育的是能力为基础的教育。与咨询和相关教育项目认证委员会(CACREP)标准保持一致的能力设计也符合第二种模式,即落后设计。这种方法认识到形成性评估和总结性评估的重要性,这些评估对不同的学习方式做出反应,对实践领域具有真实性(Alalshaikh, 2015;Moates & Cox, 2015)。此外,将技术用于课程或项目课程的全部或部分交付,体现了嵌入式评估策略的优势,以支持实时生成学生学习成果(slo)数据。这促进了在学生、课程和项目层面进行干预的机会(Akos, 2019)。提供了一个如何将该方法应用于衡量作为社会正义倡导者的能力发展的例子。2020年,2019冠状病毒病加速了全球远程教育的普及。在线教育现在是咨询教育的核心,这种趋势可能会在新冠疫情后继续下去。本文首先探讨了远程教育技术在咨询师教育中的历史,然后讨论了这种学习模式的优势和挑战,以及伦理、法律和监管方面的影响。最后,咨询师教育的未来与新兴技术一起探索,这些技术可能会再次扰乱我们的教学模式。会议论文集
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信