Diagnosis Using Brain Tumors Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (2D-PCA) with K-nearest Neighbor (KNN) Classification Algorithm

A. Warsun, A. T. Putra
{"title":"Diagnosis Using Brain Tumors Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (2D-PCA) with K-nearest Neighbor (KNN) Classification Algorithm","authors":"A. Warsun, A. T. Putra","doi":"10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of computer technology has brought more and more benefits to human life. Currently, computers can make decisions by imitating the human brain to be used in the health sector to play a role in solving existing problems. One of the technologies used is digital image processing technology on MRI images of brain tumors. Brain tumor images have various variations and large dimensions; therefore, an appropriate method is needed to recognize images maximally. Dimensional reduction uses the Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (2DPCA) method. The classification process uses the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) method by calculating the euclidean distance (Euclidean Distance). From 3 tests with the number of data 200 images, the results of the accuracy of the 1st test were 90.0% with 60 test data and 140 training data, the second test was 85.0% with 80 test data and 120 training data, and the 3rd test is worth 83.0% with 100 test data and 100 training data. Based on the research above, it can be concluded that the highest accuracy is obtained in the 1st test, while the lowest accuracy is on the 3rd test. The more amount of training data compared to the test data, the greater the accuracy value obtained. This research is expected to be a reference for further research so that the results obtained are more optimal.","PeriodicalId":418742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology","volume":"196 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of computer technology has brought more and more benefits to human life. Currently, computers can make decisions by imitating the human brain to be used in the health sector to play a role in solving existing problems. One of the technologies used is digital image processing technology on MRI images of brain tumors. Brain tumor images have various variations and large dimensions; therefore, an appropriate method is needed to recognize images maximally. Dimensional reduction uses the Two-Dimensional Principal Component Analysis (2DPCA) method. The classification process uses the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) method by calculating the euclidean distance (Euclidean Distance). From 3 tests with the number of data 200 images, the results of the accuracy of the 1st test were 90.0% with 60 test data and 140 training data, the second test was 85.0% with 80 test data and 120 training data, and the 3rd test is worth 83.0% with 100 test data and 100 training data. Based on the research above, it can be concluded that the highest accuracy is obtained in the 1st test, while the lowest accuracy is on the 3rd test. The more amount of training data compared to the test data, the greater the accuracy value obtained. This research is expected to be a reference for further research so that the results obtained are more optimal.
基于k -最近邻(KNN)分类算法的二维主成分分析(2D-PCA)诊断脑肿瘤
计算机技术的飞速发展给人类生活带来了越来越多的好处。目前,计算机可以通过模仿人脑来做出决策,用于卫生部门,在解决现有问题方面发挥作用。使用的技术之一是对脑肿瘤的核磁共振成像图像进行数字图像处理技术。脑肿瘤图像变化多样,尺寸大;因此,需要一种合适的方法来最大限度地识别图像。降维使用二维主成分分析(2DPCA)方法。分类过程通过计算欧几里得距离(euclidean distance),使用k近邻(KNN)方法。在数据数为200张的3次测试中,第一次测试的准确率为90.0%(60张测试数据和140张训练数据),第二次测试的准确率为85.0%(80张测试数据和120张训练数据),第三次测试的准确率为83.0%(100张测试数据和100张训练数据)。通过以上研究可以得出,第一次测试的准确率最高,而第三次测试的准确率最低。与测试数据相比,训练数据越多,得到的准确率值越大。期望本研究能为进一步的研究提供参考,使得到的结果更加优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信