{"title":"A Preschool Language Facilitation Program for Children with Cleft Palate","authors":"R. Cherry, N. Colburn","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1095236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"202 Early intervention speech and language programs for preschool children with cleft palate have been undertaken because the majority of research on the language development of children with cleft palate had indicated a delay in both receptive and expressive skills at some period of development (Fox, Lynch, and Brookshire, 1978; McWilliams, 1973; Morris, 1962, Philips and Harrison, 1969a, b; Shames, Rubin, and Kramer, 1966; Smith and McWilliams, 1968; Spriestersbach, Darley, and Morris, 1958). T h e reasons for this delay remain unclear. T h e presence of a cleft may provide an adequate explanation for the defective speech and voice patterns heard in children with cleft palate, but not the language delay. This delay may therefore be attributed at least in part to (1) an intellectual deficit as part of a craniofacial syndrome, (2) high incidence of conductive hearing problems (Harrison and Philips, 1971; Paradise and Bluestone, 1969), (3) environmental factors, such as frequent hospitalizations, the timing of surgical intervention, separation from families at critical language learning periods, as well as other undetermined psychosocial factors (Evans and Renfrew, 1974; Smith, 1971), and (4) the child's retreat from unrewarding speaking attempts that had not been easily understood (Morris, 1962; Spriestersbach et al., 1958). The child with a cleft palate is therefore perceived to be at greater risk for language learning problems than children without clefts. It has been well documented that this population has difficulty developing intelligible speech. This may be due to the fact that these children learn to speak with articulatory organs that differ structurally and physiologically from those of noncleft children in terms of intraoral feedback. Dental and occlusal anomalies may also contribute to the development of aberrant speech sound development. The inability of this population to valve the velopharyngeal port adequately contributes heavily to the distortions heard (Bzoch, 1959; Philips and Harrison, 1969b, Thayer, 1978; Van Demark, 1966). Early intervention programs to facilitate language and cognitive growth in handicapped preschool children at risk for","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1095236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
202 Early intervention speech and language programs for preschool children with cleft palate have been undertaken because the majority of research on the language development of children with cleft palate had indicated a delay in both receptive and expressive skills at some period of development (Fox, Lynch, and Brookshire, 1978; McWilliams, 1973; Morris, 1962, Philips and Harrison, 1969a, b; Shames, Rubin, and Kramer, 1966; Smith and McWilliams, 1968; Spriestersbach, Darley, and Morris, 1958). T h e reasons for this delay remain unclear. T h e presence of a cleft may provide an adequate explanation for the defective speech and voice patterns heard in children with cleft palate, but not the language delay. This delay may therefore be attributed at least in part to (1) an intellectual deficit as part of a craniofacial syndrome, (2) high incidence of conductive hearing problems (Harrison and Philips, 1971; Paradise and Bluestone, 1969), (3) environmental factors, such as frequent hospitalizations, the timing of surgical intervention, separation from families at critical language learning periods, as well as other undetermined psychosocial factors (Evans and Renfrew, 1974; Smith, 1971), and (4) the child's retreat from unrewarding speaking attempts that had not been easily understood (Morris, 1962; Spriestersbach et al., 1958). The child with a cleft palate is therefore perceived to be at greater risk for language learning problems than children without clefts. It has been well documented that this population has difficulty developing intelligible speech. This may be due to the fact that these children learn to speak with articulatory organs that differ structurally and physiologically from those of noncleft children in terms of intraoral feedback. Dental and occlusal anomalies may also contribute to the development of aberrant speech sound development. The inability of this population to valve the velopharyngeal port adequately contributes heavily to the distortions heard (Bzoch, 1959; Philips and Harrison, 1969b, Thayer, 1978; Van Demark, 1966). Early intervention programs to facilitate language and cognitive growth in handicapped preschool children at risk for
202学龄前腭裂儿童的早期干预言语和语言项目已经开展,因为大多数关于腭裂儿童语言发展的研究表明,在发育的某个时期,接受和表达技能都有延迟(Fox, Lynch, and Brookshire, 1978;威廉姆斯,1973;莫里斯,1962;飞利浦和哈里森,1969a, b;Shames, Rubin, and Kramer, 1966;史密斯和麦克威廉姆斯,1968年;Spriestersbach, Darley, and Morris, 1958)。这一延迟的原因尚不清楚。唇裂的存在可以为腭裂儿童的语言缺陷和声音模式提供充分的解释,但不能解释语言迟缓。因此,这种延迟可能至少部分归因于(1)颅面综合征的智力缺陷,(2)传导性听力问题的高发(Harrison and Philips, 1971;Paradise and Bluestone, 1969);(3)环境因素,如频繁的住院治疗、手术干预的时机、在关键的语言学习时期与家庭分离,以及其他不确定的社会心理因素(Evans and Renfrew, 1974;Smith, 1971),以及(4)孩子对不容易理解的无意义的说话尝试的退缩(Morris, 1962;Spriestersbach et al., 1958)。因此,有腭裂的孩子比没有腭裂的孩子更容易出现语言学习问题。有充分的证据表明,这一群体在发展可理解的语言方面存在困难。这可能是由于这些儿童在学习说话时使用的发音器官在结构上和生理上都不同于非唇裂儿童的口内反馈。牙齿和咬合异常也可能导致异常语音的发展。这群人无法对腭咽口充气阀,这在很大程度上导致了所听到的扭曲(Bzoch, 1959;Philips and Harrison, 1969b, Thayer, 1978;Van Demark, 1966)。早期干预方案,以促进语言和认知发展的残疾学龄前儿童的风险