Graphological and semantic foregrounding as affecting gaze and speech of impulsive and reflective readers

A. Izmalkova, A. Rzheshevskaya
{"title":"Graphological and semantic foregrounding as affecting gaze and speech of impulsive and reflective readers","authors":"A. Izmalkova, A. Rzheshevskaya","doi":"10.3897/lamo.2.78721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study explores the effects of graphological and semantic foregrounding on speech and gaze behavior in textual information construal of subjects with higher and lower impulsivity. Eye movements of sixteen participants were recorded as they read drama texts with interdiscourse switching (semantic foregrounding), with features of typeface distinct from the surrounding text (graphological foregrounding). Discourse modification patterns were analyzed and processed in several steps: specification of participant/object/action/event/perspective modification, parametric annotation of participants’ discourse responses, contrastive analysis of modification parameter activity and parameter synchronized activity. Significant distinctions were found in eye movement parameters (gaze count and initial fixation duration) in subjects with higher and lower impulsivity when reading parts of text with graphological foregrounding. Impulsive subjects tended to visit the areas more often with longer initial fixations than reflective subjects, which is explained in terms of stimulus-driven attention, associated with bottom-up processes. However, these differences in gaze behavior did not result in pronounced distinctions in discourse responses, which were only slightly mediated by impulsivity/reflectivity.","PeriodicalId":121794,"journal":{"name":"Languages and Modalities","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages and Modalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.2.78721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores the effects of graphological and semantic foregrounding on speech and gaze behavior in textual information construal of subjects with higher and lower impulsivity. Eye movements of sixteen participants were recorded as they read drama texts with interdiscourse switching (semantic foregrounding), with features of typeface distinct from the surrounding text (graphological foregrounding). Discourse modification patterns were analyzed and processed in several steps: specification of participant/object/action/event/perspective modification, parametric annotation of participants’ discourse responses, contrastive analysis of modification parameter activity and parameter synchronized activity. Significant distinctions were found in eye movement parameters (gaze count and initial fixation duration) in subjects with higher and lower impulsivity when reading parts of text with graphological foregrounding. Impulsive subjects tended to visit the areas more often with longer initial fixations than reflective subjects, which is explained in terms of stimulus-driven attention, associated with bottom-up processes. However, these differences in gaze behavior did not result in pronounced distinctions in discourse responses, which were only slightly mediated by impulsivity/reflectivity.
Graphological和语义前景影响冲动和反思性读者的凝视和言语
本研究探讨了文字前景和语义前景对高、低冲动性被试文本信息解释中言语和凝视行为的影响。16名参与者在阅读具有话语间转换(语义前景)的戏剧文本时,记录了他们的眼球运动,这些文本具有与周围文本不同的字体特征(笔迹前景)。本文分参与者/对象/动作/事件/视角修饰的规范、参与者话语反应的参数化标注、修饰参数活动和参数同步活动的对比分析等几个步骤对话语修饰模式进行了分析和处理。在阅读文字前景部分时,冲动性高的受试者和冲动性低的受试者在眼球运动参数(凝视次数和初始注视时间)上存在显著差异。与反思型受试者相比,冲动型受试者更倾向于以更长的初始注视时间访问这些区域,这可以用刺激驱动的注意力来解释,这种注意力与自下而上的过程有关。然而,凝视行为的这些差异并没有导致话语反应的显著差异,话语反应仅受到冲动性/反射率的轻微调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信