Quantifying fish catches and fish consumption in the Amazon Basin

A. Sirén, J. Valbo‐Jørgensen
{"title":"Quantifying fish catches and fish consumption in the Amazon Basin","authors":"A. Sirén, J. Valbo‐Jørgensen","doi":"10.14321/aehm.025.01.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Amazon Basin is the largest in the world and for many of its inhabitants fishing is a crucially important source of food and income. However, the benefits derived from mostly informal, part time, seasonal, and subsistence-based activities such as fishing are largely invisible to policy-makers, and addressing the threats to aquatic habitats, ecosystem functioning, and fisheries is frequently given low priority in national development agendas. To estimate the total extraction of fish in the Amazon Basin, we reviewed various publications and databases with quantitative data related to the landings, trade, and consumption of fish. We estimated the total landings to be between 422,000 and 473,000 t yr-1 in live weight, near to previous estimates. Almost 75%, however, represented landings in the Brazilian part of the basin, and there is a very large margin of uncertainty given that, among other issues, there are no recent official statistics on commercial landings. Conversely, landings in Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador seem to be considerably higher than previously thought. In all Amazonian countries, from 50% up to almost 100% of the fishing takes place for personal consumption, implying that it is not recorded in official landing statistics. Available time series data indicate that fish consumption in Brazil, as well as commercial fish landings in Peru and Colombia, have declined in recent years. Local case studies, national household consumption and expenditure surveys (HCES), and market surveys, all have their benefits and drawbacks. Some minor modifications of HCES procedures could considerably improve their usefulness for estimating fish landings in the Amazon Basin. To improve such estimates, we propose that local case studies be used to calibrate HCES data, thus combining the high precision of local case studies with the wide coverage and representativity of HCES data","PeriodicalId":421207,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/aehm.025.01.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Amazon Basin is the largest in the world and for many of its inhabitants fishing is a crucially important source of food and income. However, the benefits derived from mostly informal, part time, seasonal, and subsistence-based activities such as fishing are largely invisible to policy-makers, and addressing the threats to aquatic habitats, ecosystem functioning, and fisheries is frequently given low priority in national development agendas. To estimate the total extraction of fish in the Amazon Basin, we reviewed various publications and databases with quantitative data related to the landings, trade, and consumption of fish. We estimated the total landings to be between 422,000 and 473,000 t yr-1 in live weight, near to previous estimates. Almost 75%, however, represented landings in the Brazilian part of the basin, and there is a very large margin of uncertainty given that, among other issues, there are no recent official statistics on commercial landings. Conversely, landings in Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador seem to be considerably higher than previously thought. In all Amazonian countries, from 50% up to almost 100% of the fishing takes place for personal consumption, implying that it is not recorded in official landing statistics. Available time series data indicate that fish consumption in Brazil, as well as commercial fish landings in Peru and Colombia, have declined in recent years. Local case studies, national household consumption and expenditure surveys (HCES), and market surveys, all have their benefits and drawbacks. Some minor modifications of HCES procedures could considerably improve their usefulness for estimating fish landings in the Amazon Basin. To improve such estimates, we propose that local case studies be used to calibrate HCES data, thus combining the high precision of local case studies with the wide coverage and representativity of HCES data
量化亚马逊流域的鱼类捕捞和鱼类消费
亚马逊盆地是世界上最大的盆地,对许多居民来说,渔业是至关重要的食物和收入来源。然而,政策制定者在很大程度上忽视了捕鱼等非正式、非全时、季节性和以生存为基础的活动所带来的利益,而且在国家发展议程中,解决水生栖息地、生态系统功能和渔业所面临的威胁往往被置于较低的优先地位。为了估计亚马逊流域鱼类的总采取量,我们查阅了各种出版物和数据库中与鱼类的登陆、贸易和消费相关的定量数据。我们估计每年的总着陆重量在42.2万到473000吨之间,接近之前的估计。然而,近75%的着陆是在盆地的巴西部分,考虑到最近没有商业着陆的官方统计数据等问题,存在很大的不确定性。相反,玻利维亚、哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔的登陆人数似乎比之前认为的要高得多。在所有的亚马逊流域国家,从50%到几乎100%的捕鱼都是为了个人消费,这意味着它没有被记录在官方的登陆统计中。现有的时间序列数据表明,近年来巴西的鱼类消费量以及秘鲁和哥伦比亚的商业鱼类捕捞量都有所下降。地方案例研究、全国家庭消费和支出调查(HCES)以及市场调查,都有各自的优缺点。对HCES程序稍加修改就可大大提高其在估计亚马逊河流域鱼类登陆量方面的效用。为了改善这种估计,我们建议使用当地案例研究来校准HCES数据,从而将当地案例研究的高精度与HCES数据的广泛覆盖和代表性相结合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信