2022 ACM PODS Alberto O. Mendelzon Test-of-Time Award

Michael Bender, Michael Benedikt, Sudeepa Roy
{"title":"2022 ACM PODS Alberto O. Mendelzon Test-of-Time Award","authors":"Michael Bender, Michael Benedikt, Sudeepa Roy","doi":"10.1145/3517804.3526070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citation. This paper took research on a fundamental problem in database research join query processing in a new direction. Its motivation was the bound on join query size of Atserias, Grohe, and Marx, now known as the AGM bound (FOCS 2008). This raised the question of whether a join algorithm can achieve a worst-case running time in line with this bound. This paper presents an algorithm that achieves this bound, while showing that traditional query plans cannot achieve it. In the process, they connect join processing questions with geometric inequalities, a connection that has proven fruitful in subsequent work. The algorithmic contribution in this paper almost immediately resonated within database applications when it was observed that a join algorithm recently implemented in industry, Leapfrog Triejoin, achieves a similar optimality guarantee. This led to a line of papers and implementations of join algorithms building off the ideas in the paper. The contribution of the paper to analysis of join queries has arguably been more profound – the connection between join query processing, geometric inequalities, and worst-case size bounds have been subsequently explored in many other contexts, including in the presence of integrity constraints. This work has already been honored with a “Gems of PODS” talk in PODS 2018: the conference paper, journal paper in JACM, and SIGMOD record survey article discussing later developments are all highly cited. This underlines the fact that this paper represented a major departure point for research in database theory.","PeriodicalId":230606,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3517804.3526070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citation. This paper took research on a fundamental problem in database research join query processing in a new direction. Its motivation was the bound on join query size of Atserias, Grohe, and Marx, now known as the AGM bound (FOCS 2008). This raised the question of whether a join algorithm can achieve a worst-case running time in line with this bound. This paper presents an algorithm that achieves this bound, while showing that traditional query plans cannot achieve it. In the process, they connect join processing questions with geometric inequalities, a connection that has proven fruitful in subsequent work. The algorithmic contribution in this paper almost immediately resonated within database applications when it was observed that a join algorithm recently implemented in industry, Leapfrog Triejoin, achieves a similar optimality guarantee. This led to a line of papers and implementations of join algorithms building off the ideas in the paper. The contribution of the paper to analysis of join queries has arguably been more profound – the connection between join query processing, geometric inequalities, and worst-case size bounds have been subsequently explored in many other contexts, including in the presence of integrity constraints. This work has already been honored with a “Gems of PODS” talk in PODS 2018: the conference paper, journal paper in JACM, and SIGMOD record survey article discussing later developments are all highly cited. This underlines the fact that this paper represented a major departure point for research in database theory.
2022年ACM PODS Alberto O. Mendelzon时间测试奖
引用。本文对数据库研究中的一个基本问题——联接查询处理进行了新的研究。其动机是Atserias、Grohe和Marx的连接查询大小的界限,现在称为AGM界限(FOCS 2008)。这就提出了一个问题,即连接算法是否可以达到符合此界限的最坏情况运行时间。本文提出了一种实现这一界限的算法,同时指出传统的查询计划无法实现这一界限。在此过程中,他们将连接处理问题与几何不等式联系起来,这种联系在随后的工作中被证明是富有成效的。当观察到最近在工业中实现的连接算法Leapfrog trijoin实现了类似的最优性保证时,本文中的算法贡献几乎立即在数据库应用程序中引起了共鸣。这导致了一系列的论文和基于论文思想的连接算法的实现。本文对连接查询分析的贡献可以说是更深远的——连接查询处理、几何不等式和最坏情况大小界限之间的联系随后在许多其他上下文中进行了探索,包括存在完整性约束的情况下。这项工作已经在PODS 2018上获得了“PODS的宝石”演讲的荣誉:会议论文,JACM的期刊论文,以及讨论后来发展的SIGMOD记录调查文章都被高度引用。这强调了一个事实,即本文代表了数据库理论研究的一个主要出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信