A Tale of Two Competition Law Regimes - The Telecom-Sector Competition Regulation in Hong Kong and Singapore

Thomas K. Cheng
{"title":"A Tale of Two Competition Law Regimes - The Telecom-Sector Competition Regulation in Hong Kong and Singapore","authors":"Thomas K. Cheng","doi":"10.54648/woco2007031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition law has seen very active development in Asia in recent years. Ironically, Hong Kong and Singapore, as two of the freest and most competitive economies in the region, long held a sceptical attitude towards competition law. Singapore enacted its first cross-sector competition law in 2004, some say only due to American pressure. For years, the Hong Kong government defended its sectoral model and insisted that the city had no need for a cross-sector competition law. However, that obstinate attitude shifted in March 2007, when the government announced that Hong Kong would follow Singapore’s footsteps. Until the new law is passed, however, telecommunications remain one of the two sectors in both economies that are subject to active competition law enforcement. The telecom-sector regimes hence may provide useful examples for the new general competition regulator in Singapore, and for Hong Kong as it drafts its new cross-sector law. These telecom-sector regimes also carry independent significance. They are part of the two governments’ effort to liberalize their respective telecom sectors. This article evaluates these two regimes in light of their avowed objective of facilitating liberalization, and draws lessons from their experience to shed light on Hong Kong’s effort to adopt a cross-sector competition law.","PeriodicalId":292366,"journal":{"name":"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2007031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Competition law has seen very active development in Asia in recent years. Ironically, Hong Kong and Singapore, as two of the freest and most competitive economies in the region, long held a sceptical attitude towards competition law. Singapore enacted its first cross-sector competition law in 2004, some say only due to American pressure. For years, the Hong Kong government defended its sectoral model and insisted that the city had no need for a cross-sector competition law. However, that obstinate attitude shifted in March 2007, when the government announced that Hong Kong would follow Singapore’s footsteps. Until the new law is passed, however, telecommunications remain one of the two sectors in both economies that are subject to active competition law enforcement. The telecom-sector regimes hence may provide useful examples for the new general competition regulator in Singapore, and for Hong Kong as it drafts its new cross-sector law. These telecom-sector regimes also carry independent significance. They are part of the two governments’ effort to liberalize their respective telecom sectors. This article evaluates these two regimes in light of their avowed objective of facilitating liberalization, and draws lessons from their experience to shed light on Hong Kong’s effort to adopt a cross-sector competition law.
两个竞争法制度的故事-香港和新加坡电讯行业的竞争规管
近年来,竞争法在亚洲得到了非常积极的发展。讽刺的是,作为该地区最自由、最具竞争力的两个经济体,香港和新加坡长期以来对竞争法持怀疑态度。新加坡于2004年颁布了第一部跨部门竞争法,有人说这只是迫于美国的压力。多年来,香港政府一直为自己的行业模式辩护,坚称香港不需要一部跨行业竞争法。然而,这种顽固的态度在2007年3月发生了转变,当时香港政府宣布将跟随新加坡的脚步。然而,在新法律通过之前,电信仍然是两个经济体中受到积极竞争法执法的两个部门之一。因此,电信部门的制度可能为新加坡新的一般竞争监管机构和香港起草新的跨行业法律提供有用的例子。这些电信部门制度也具有独立的意义。这是两国政府开放各自电信行业努力的一部分。本文将根据这两种制度所宣称的促进自由化的目标,对它们进行评估,并从它们的经验中吸取教训,以帮助香港制定跨行业竞争法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信