Server class disk drives: how reliable are they?

Jon G. Elerath, Sunnyvale Sandeep Shah
{"title":"Server class disk drives: how reliable are they?","authors":"Jon G. Elerath, Sunnyvale Sandeep Shah","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hard disk drive manufacturers frequently set high expectations for drive reliability from their specifications, test results and \"global returns database\". However, field reliability experienced by customers often does not match those expectations. Actual disk drive reliability may differ greatly from the manufacturer's specification and from customer to customer because of dependence on a variety of factors, some of which are completely independent of the drive design or manufacturing process. Thermal environment and duty cycle, inherent characteristics of the drive itself, architecture and logic of the system in which it is used, and the data collection and analysis process itself are all sources of significant variability. Together, these can create a range on mean time between failures (MTBF), if MTBF is indeed the correct metric, of 350,000 to 1,200,000 hours over the lifetime of a population of server class disk drives. This paper further elaborates on these four causes of variability and explains how each is responsible for a possible gap between expected and measured drive reliability.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Hard disk drive manufacturers frequently set high expectations for drive reliability from their specifications, test results and "global returns database". However, field reliability experienced by customers often does not match those expectations. Actual disk drive reliability may differ greatly from the manufacturer's specification and from customer to customer because of dependence on a variety of factors, some of which are completely independent of the drive design or manufacturing process. Thermal environment and duty cycle, inherent characteristics of the drive itself, architecture and logic of the system in which it is used, and the data collection and analysis process itself are all sources of significant variability. Together, these can create a range on mean time between failures (MTBF), if MTBF is indeed the correct metric, of 350,000 to 1,200,000 hours over the lifetime of a population of server class disk drives. This paper further elaborates on these four causes of variability and explains how each is responsible for a possible gap between expected and measured drive reliability.
服务器级磁盘驱动器:它们有多可靠?
硬盘驱动器制造商经常从其规格、测试结果和“全球退货数据库”中对驱动器可靠性设定很高的期望。然而,客户体验到的现场可靠性往往不符合这些期望。由于对各种因素的依赖,实际的磁盘驱动器可靠性可能与制造商的规格和客户之间存在很大差异,其中一些因素完全独立于驱动器设计或制造过程。热环境和占空比,驱动本身的固有特性,使用它的系统的架构和逻辑,以及数据收集和分析过程本身都是显著可变性的来源。总之,它们可以创建一个平均故障间隔时间(MTBF)的范围(如果MTBF确实是正确的度量标准),在服务器类磁盘驱动器的整个生命周期中,该范围为350,000到1,200,000小时。本文进一步阐述了这四个原因的可变性,并解释了每个是如何负责一个可能的差距之间的预期和测量驱动可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信