Comparative study of the performances of opaque and transparent patch antennas

A. Sissoko, A. Chousseaud, T. Razban, M. Brunet, S. Ginestar, B. Diourte
{"title":"Comparative study of the performances of opaque and transparent patch antennas","authors":"A. Sissoko, A. Chousseaud, T. Razban, M. Brunet, S. Ginestar, B. Diourte","doi":"10.54647/physics14409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performances of two microstrip patch antennas with low visual impact are presented in this paper and compared to an opaque solution. These con-sist in a copper film deposited on a Borofloat 33 glass substrate through a thin titanium gripping layer. The mesh is obtained by wet chemical etching. Antennas differ by the dimensions in the ground plane mesh pattern. The opaque antenna only consists of a full copper deposit. The transparency work was mainly carried out on the ground plane as it is the largest area available. Specific attention is paid to optical transparency in the visible light spectrum, sheet resistance and electromagnetic performances in the [2.8; 3 GHz] bandwidth. They are measured in each case, compared and discussed. Both simu-lations and measurement results show good performance, especially the antenna with the most transparent ground plane: a high level of optical transparency of almost 73%, coupled with a sheet resistance of less than 0.028 Ohms/sq and a gain of about 3.22 dBi at 2.8 GHz, slightly higher than the gain of the reference opaque antenna of about 2.66 dBi at 2.99 GHz. The opaque reference antenna has a bandwidth of 1.30 GHz while those of the transparent antennas are about 1.60 GHz and 2.10 GHz (S 11 < −10 dB). This solution presents a real interest for low cost integrated and discrete antenna solutions in ISM band.","PeriodicalId":194720,"journal":{"name":"SCIREA Journal of Physics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIREA Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54647/physics14409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performances of two microstrip patch antennas with low visual impact are presented in this paper and compared to an opaque solution. These con-sist in a copper film deposited on a Borofloat 33 glass substrate through a thin titanium gripping layer. The mesh is obtained by wet chemical etching. Antennas differ by the dimensions in the ground plane mesh pattern. The opaque antenna only consists of a full copper deposit. The transparency work was mainly carried out on the ground plane as it is the largest area available. Specific attention is paid to optical transparency in the visible light spectrum, sheet resistance and electromagnetic performances in the [2.8; 3 GHz] bandwidth. They are measured in each case, compared and discussed. Both simu-lations and measurement results show good performance, especially the antenna with the most transparent ground plane: a high level of optical transparency of almost 73%, coupled with a sheet resistance of less than 0.028 Ohms/sq and a gain of about 3.22 dBi at 2.8 GHz, slightly higher than the gain of the reference opaque antenna of about 2.66 dBi at 2.99 GHz. The opaque reference antenna has a bandwidth of 1.30 GHz while those of the transparent antennas are about 1.60 GHz and 2.10 GHz (S 11 < −10 dB). This solution presents a real interest for low cost integrated and discrete antenna solutions in ISM band.
不透明和透明贴片天线性能的比较研究
本文介绍了两种低视觉冲击微带贴片天线的性能,并与不透明方案进行了比较。这些由铜膜组成,通过薄钛夹持层沉积在硼浮33玻璃基板上。网格是通过湿化学蚀刻得到的。天线在地平面网格图中的尺寸不同。不透明天线只由一层完整的铜镀层组成。透明工作主要在地平面上进行,因为它是最大的可用区域。特别关注可见光光谱中的光学透明度,片材电阻和电磁性能[2.8;3ghz]带宽。在每种情况下对它们进行测量、比较和讨论。仿真和测量结果均显示出良好的性能,特别是具有最透明地平面的天线:光学透明度接近73%,片电阻小于0.028欧姆/平方,2.8 GHz时增益约3.22 dBi,略高于参考不透明天线2.99 GHz时增益约2.66 dBi。不透明参考天线的带宽为1.30 GHz,透明参考天线的带宽约为1.60 GHz和2.10 GHz (S 11 <−10 dB)。该解决方案为ISM频段的低成本集成和离散天线解决方案提供了真正的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信