Mohamed Elokr, A. Lotfy, Wei Xing, Huijing Li, Ahmed El Bassioni, Nader Moatasem
{"title":"Seismic Reprocessing Leads to New Breakthroughs——A Successful Case in the ASH Field, A.G. Basin in Egypt","authors":"Mohamed Elokr, A. Lotfy, Wei Xing, Huijing Li, Ahmed El Bassioni, Nader Moatasem","doi":"10.2118/214066-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n ASH oil field located in the east of the AG Basin in Egypt. Lower Cretaceous Alam El Bueib is the main oil producing formation. Due high heterogeneity of the Abu Roash Members succession in addition to the influence of thick limestone of the Upper Cretaceous and the influence of multiple complex faults, the quality of seismic data is very poor. This is mainly manifested in, a, the variation of vertical velocity in lithology changes resulting a significant error in depth migration; b, the fault imaging is not clear due to low S/N ratio, which leads to serious challenge for structure mapping. Therefore, the seismic re-processing was carried out.\n Two key techniques were carried out to achieve the target, that: uses new well VSP data to adjust the velocity model and CRAM PSDM for re-processing.\n Adjusting the velocity model: The previous PSDM acquired in 2015 had no well control covering the deeper target of Alam El Bueib Formation but the advantage of using VSP data of ASH-3 well as a well control for building new velocity model of the reprocessed data. CRAM PSDM re-processing: The CRAM (Common Reflection Angle Migration) is a cluster-based imaging system that generates conventional reflection angle gathers without azimuth dependency. Optimal local tapered beams are internally created and imaged to form high-quality image gathers, which can then be used in standard interpretation systems for accurate velocity model building and amplitude inversion (AVA).\n Applying CRAM technology in depth migration instead of Kirchhoff depth migration, has a great impact on enhance the final seismic image. The CRAM algorithm is using the Ray path migration of the seismic signal instead of using migration aperture as in Kirchhoff. Applying the ray path migration helps in adopting the seismic trace position ultimately enhance the fault definition and S/N ratio at the deeper target levels.\n As a practical case from the comparable seismic sections, same arbitrary line in different seismic volumes, the reprocessed data showed a high level of improvement in fault definition specially in the north portion of ASH field closer to the major fault which was very poor in the previous data. In the reprocessed CRAM PSDM data, the good amplitude extended towards the north and west portions of the field, which allowed to define the faults through Alam El Bueib horizon and decrease the uncertainty of the new proposed well location in the entire field. (Figure 1)\n Figure 1 Amplitude comparison between reprocessed and original data, ASH field","PeriodicalId":286390,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214066-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ASH oil field located in the east of the AG Basin in Egypt. Lower Cretaceous Alam El Bueib is the main oil producing formation. Due high heterogeneity of the Abu Roash Members succession in addition to the influence of thick limestone of the Upper Cretaceous and the influence of multiple complex faults, the quality of seismic data is very poor. This is mainly manifested in, a, the variation of vertical velocity in lithology changes resulting a significant error in depth migration; b, the fault imaging is not clear due to low S/N ratio, which leads to serious challenge for structure mapping. Therefore, the seismic re-processing was carried out.
Two key techniques were carried out to achieve the target, that: uses new well VSP data to adjust the velocity model and CRAM PSDM for re-processing.
Adjusting the velocity model: The previous PSDM acquired in 2015 had no well control covering the deeper target of Alam El Bueib Formation but the advantage of using VSP data of ASH-3 well as a well control for building new velocity model of the reprocessed data. CRAM PSDM re-processing: The CRAM (Common Reflection Angle Migration) is a cluster-based imaging system that generates conventional reflection angle gathers without azimuth dependency. Optimal local tapered beams are internally created and imaged to form high-quality image gathers, which can then be used in standard interpretation systems for accurate velocity model building and amplitude inversion (AVA).
Applying CRAM technology in depth migration instead of Kirchhoff depth migration, has a great impact on enhance the final seismic image. The CRAM algorithm is using the Ray path migration of the seismic signal instead of using migration aperture as in Kirchhoff. Applying the ray path migration helps in adopting the seismic trace position ultimately enhance the fault definition and S/N ratio at the deeper target levels.
As a practical case from the comparable seismic sections, same arbitrary line in different seismic volumes, the reprocessed data showed a high level of improvement in fault definition specially in the north portion of ASH field closer to the major fault which was very poor in the previous data. In the reprocessed CRAM PSDM data, the good amplitude extended towards the north and west portions of the field, which allowed to define the faults through Alam El Bueib horizon and decrease the uncertainty of the new proposed well location in the entire field. (Figure 1)
Figure 1 Amplitude comparison between reprocessed and original data, ASH field
ASH油田位于埃及AG盆地东部。下白垩统Alam El Bueib是主要的产油层。由于Abu Roash段序列非均质性强,加之上白垩统厚灰岩的影响和多处复杂断裂的影响,地震资料质量很差。这主要表现在:1、岩性变化中垂直速度的变化导致深度偏移误差较大;b、低信噪比导致断层成像不清晰,给构造成图带来严峻挑战。因此,进行了地震再处理。为实现这一目标,采用了两项关键技术:利用新井VSP数据调整速度模型和CRAM PSDM进行再处理。调整速度模型:2015年获得的PSDM没有覆盖Alam El Bueib地层深层目标的井控,但利用ASH-3井的VSP数据作为井控的优势,可以建立新的再处理数据的速度模型。CRAM(共反射角偏移)是一种基于聚类的成像系统,它产生常规的反射角集,而不依赖于方位角。最佳的局部锥形光束在内部产生并成像,形成高质量的图像集合,然后可以用于标准解释系统,用于精确的速度模型构建和振幅反演(AVA)。采用CRAM技术进行深度偏移,代替Kirchhoff深度偏移,对增强最终地震图像有很大的影响。CRAM算法是利用地震信号的射线路径偏移,而不是像Kirchhoff算法那样使用偏移孔径。射线路径偏移有助于采用地震迹线位置,最终提高更深目标层的断层清晰度和信噪比。作为不同地震体中相同任意线的可比较地震剖面的实际案例,重新处理后的数据在断层定义上有了很大的提高,特别是在靠近主断层的ASH田北部,这在以前的数据中是很差的。在重新处理的CRAM PSDM数据中,良好的振幅向油田的北部和西部延伸,这使得可以通过Alam El Bueib层确定断层,并降低了整个油田新提议的井位的不确定性。(图1)图1再处理后与原始数据的振幅对比,ASH场