{"title":"Keynes trilemma from the viewpoint of Kleiner tetrad under the cataclysms in the society","authors":"A. Nikonova","doi":"10.21202/2782-2923.2022.1.5-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to study the relations of a pair of the social system sectors in G. B. Kleyner’s tetrad, the state and the society, in different situations; to confirm the hypothesis about the difference in the society’s demands and the state’s response to environmental change, including the current crisis; to investigate the factors and possible ways to balance the interactions of the pair of sectors.Methods: the trilemma of J. M. Keynes is studied in the application to the internal policy of the state from the standpoint of the systemic economic paradigm developed at the CEMI RAS under the supervision of G. B. Kleyner.Results: using the tetrad model, the conditions for balanced interactions between the state and society are identified in the interpretation of the Keynes trilemma from the standpoint of welfare, freedoms, and justice. Based on the spatial-temporal analysis, Keynes’ hypothesis of the incompatibility of these goals simultaneously in the state policy is confirmed. The importance of adaptive policy is growing in a period of instability, when the structure of people’s requests is changing: the need for freedom becomes less relevant than the request for protection and quality of life.Scientific novelty: based on the idea of the cyclical nature of the interaction between the state and society in the course of social development, patterns of sporadic occurrence and reproduction of threats to society in the absence of a reactive response to changes in the requests of agents during the exchange of resources in the macro-system are established. The key factors include the immanent basic conditions and foundations of human existence, which are the root cause of the shifting balance in the dynamics of relations (the balance of expectations of society and state policy), depending on how these needs are met. The hypothesis of a close connection of these driving factors with the critical signs of social relations in the existing model of the economy of the Russian Federation and other countries is empirically confirmed. The expansion of knowledge of the relationship between the structural and functional characteristics of the macro-system contributes to the solution of the central task of systems research.Practical significance: the results revealed the prerequisites for the shifting of the public policy accents under the modern cataclysms. The joint use of the Keynes trilemma and Kleyner’s tetrad in such a research perspective can contribute to the formation of a synthetic approach to the analysis and modeling of mutual expectations of the key agents, the coordination of requests, and the development of divergent policies that contribute to the system harmonization.","PeriodicalId":284471,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2022.1.5-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: to study the relations of a pair of the social system sectors in G. B. Kleyner’s tetrad, the state and the society, in different situations; to confirm the hypothesis about the difference in the society’s demands and the state’s response to environmental change, including the current crisis; to investigate the factors and possible ways to balance the interactions of the pair of sectors.Methods: the trilemma of J. M. Keynes is studied in the application to the internal policy of the state from the standpoint of the systemic economic paradigm developed at the CEMI RAS under the supervision of G. B. Kleyner.Results: using the tetrad model, the conditions for balanced interactions between the state and society are identified in the interpretation of the Keynes trilemma from the standpoint of welfare, freedoms, and justice. Based on the spatial-temporal analysis, Keynes’ hypothesis of the incompatibility of these goals simultaneously in the state policy is confirmed. The importance of adaptive policy is growing in a period of instability, when the structure of people’s requests is changing: the need for freedom becomes less relevant than the request for protection and quality of life.Scientific novelty: based on the idea of the cyclical nature of the interaction between the state and society in the course of social development, patterns of sporadic occurrence and reproduction of threats to society in the absence of a reactive response to changes in the requests of agents during the exchange of resources in the macro-system are established. The key factors include the immanent basic conditions and foundations of human existence, which are the root cause of the shifting balance in the dynamics of relations (the balance of expectations of society and state policy), depending on how these needs are met. The hypothesis of a close connection of these driving factors with the critical signs of social relations in the existing model of the economy of the Russian Federation and other countries is empirically confirmed. The expansion of knowledge of the relationship between the structural and functional characteristics of the macro-system contributes to the solution of the central task of systems research.Practical significance: the results revealed the prerequisites for the shifting of the public policy accents under the modern cataclysms. The joint use of the Keynes trilemma and Kleyner’s tetrad in such a research perspective can contribute to the formation of a synthetic approach to the analysis and modeling of mutual expectations of the key agents, the coordination of requests, and the development of divergent policies that contribute to the system harmonization.
目的:研究G. B. Kleyner四分体中国家与社会这一对社会系统部门在不同情况下的关系;确认社会需求与国家应对环境变化(包括当前危机)的差异的假设;探讨平衡这对部门相互作用的因素和可能的方法。方法:从克莱纳(G. B. Kleyner)指导下由CEMI RAS发展的系统经济范式的角度,研究凯恩斯的三难困境在国家内部政策中的应用。结果:使用四分体模型,从福利、自由和正义的角度解释凯恩斯三难困境,确定了国家与社会之间平衡互动的条件。在时空分析的基础上,证实了凯恩斯关于这些目标在国家政策中同时不相容的假设。适应性政策的重要性在不稳定时期日益增加,因为人民要求的结构正在发生变化:对自由的需要不如对保护和生活质量的要求重要。科学新颖性:基于国家与社会在社会发展过程中相互作用的周期性思想,在宏观系统资源交换过程中,在缺乏对主体要求变化的反应性反应的情况下,建立了对社会威胁的零星发生和再生产模式。关键因素包括人类生存的内在基本条件和基础,这是关系动态平衡(社会期望和国家政策的平衡)变化的根本原因,取决于这些需求如何得到满足。这些驱动因素与俄罗斯联邦和其他国家现有经济模式中社会关系的关键迹象密切相关的假设得到了经验的证实。对宏观系统的结构特征和功能特征之间关系的认识的扩展有助于解决系统研究的中心任务。现实意义:研究结果揭示了现代大灾难下公共政策重心转移的先决条件。在这种研究视角下,凯恩斯三难困境和克莱纳四难困境的联合使用有助于形成一种综合方法来分析和建模关键主体的相互期望,协调请求,以及制定有助于系统协调的不同政策。