Healthcare Financing: European Experience and Russian Practice

Антропов Владислав Владимирович
{"title":"Healthcare Financing: European Experience and Russian Practice","authors":"Антропов Владислав Владимирович","doi":"10.26794/1999-849x-2019-12-2-115-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the research is healthcare financing systems in European countries and Russia. The relevance of the problem stems from the possibility of using successful foreign experience for the organization of healthcare financing in Russia. The purpose of the research was to examine the specific features of the establishing and funding healthcare models in countries of Europe and the possibilities of their experience in organizing healthcare financing in the Russian Federation. The paper examines the current state of the two models of health financing in the EU — budget funding and insurance. By the example of individual European countries, the operation specifics of each model are analyzed, their advantages and disadvantages are assessed. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of the healthcare financing system in Russia and its difference from foreign systems. Taking into account the foreign experience and the need to improve the Russian compulsory healthcare insurance (CHI) system, the paper proposes ways to improve the Russian model of healthcare financing: establishment of a unified organizational and financial CHI model; introduction of a system of equal participation of the employer and employee in the financing of compulsory healthcare insurance; introduction of a family insurance system; promotion of voluntary healthcare insurance programs. It is concluded that the keypoint in the CHI system restructuring should be the search for socially acceptable and economically justified forms of attracting public funds. At the same time, it is extremely important that the funds received by medical institutions do not increase the shadow incomes in the economy but are spent on the development of the healthcare system.","PeriodicalId":143414,"journal":{"name":"Economics, taxes & law","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics, taxes & law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849x-2019-12-2-115-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The subject of the research is healthcare financing systems in European countries and Russia. The relevance of the problem stems from the possibility of using successful foreign experience for the organization of healthcare financing in Russia. The purpose of the research was to examine the specific features of the establishing and funding healthcare models in countries of Europe and the possibilities of their experience in organizing healthcare financing in the Russian Federation. The paper examines the current state of the two models of health financing in the EU — budget funding and insurance. By the example of individual European countries, the operation specifics of each model are analyzed, their advantages and disadvantages are assessed. Particular attention is paid to the specifics of the healthcare financing system in Russia and its difference from foreign systems. Taking into account the foreign experience and the need to improve the Russian compulsory healthcare insurance (CHI) system, the paper proposes ways to improve the Russian model of healthcare financing: establishment of a unified organizational and financial CHI model; introduction of a system of equal participation of the employer and employee in the financing of compulsory healthcare insurance; introduction of a family insurance system; promotion of voluntary healthcare insurance programs. It is concluded that the keypoint in the CHI system restructuring should be the search for socially acceptable and economically justified forms of attracting public funds. At the same time, it is extremely important that the funds received by medical institutions do not increase the shadow incomes in the economy but are spent on the development of the healthcare system.
医疗融资:欧洲经验和俄罗斯实践
该研究的主题是欧洲国家和俄罗斯的医疗融资系统。这一问题的相关性源于利用国外成功经验组织俄罗斯医疗保健筹资的可能性。这项研究的目的是审查欧洲各国建立和资助保健模式的具体特点,以及它们在俄罗斯联邦组织保健筹资方面的经验的可能性。本文考察了欧盟卫生筹资的两种模式——预算筹资和保险筹资的现状。以欧洲各国为例,分析了各模式的运行特点,评价了各模式的优缺点。特别关注的是俄罗斯医疗融资系统的具体情况及其与外国系统的不同之处。本文结合国外经验和完善俄罗斯强制医疗保险制度的需要,提出了完善俄罗斯强制医疗保险筹资模式的途径:建立统一的组织和财务强制医疗保险模式;实行雇主和雇员平等参与强制性医疗保险筹资的制度;引进家庭保险制度;推动自愿性医疗保险计划。结论是,医疗保险制度改革的重点应是寻找社会可接受和经济上合理的吸引公共资金的形式。同时,极为重要的是,医疗机构收到的资金不能增加经济中的影子收入,而是用于医疗保健系统的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信