Reshaping European and national security in a post COVID – 19 context

Natea Mihaela Daciana, A. M. Daniel
{"title":"Reshaping European and national security in a post COVID – 19 context","authors":"Natea Mihaela Daciana, A. M. Daniel","doi":"10.2478/amso-2020-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 crisis, undoubtedly, raised a series of questions concerning aspects of national and human security. The crisis impact, per se, tested, in extremis, the medical systems and the political capacity to take swift decisions needed to protect the population. It is a general accepted thesis that the world will face a second wave of effects: economic and systemic. Regarding the last aspect, the current international system is constructed around many principles among them, relevant for our research are, global governance and national sovereignty. The manner in which the two concepts operate was tested during the pandemic. On one hand the international system of global governance failed to ensure a higher level of human security when facing a crisis. On the other hand, states were left to tackle the effects of the pandemic, more or less alone, as the entire international system was paralyzed. In this context state had to turn to classic concepts of national security, egocentric and protectionist, but needed to ensure one of its fundamental functions – providing the security of its citizens. As others crisis are expected to unfold in a domino like effect, redefining national security will be essential for states and regional organizations. But in this process decisions could collide with assumed international obligations. In this context the article explores this impact of the COVID 19 over the how states define their national security concepts. In this context a special attention will be given, as an example, to the industry sector in the context of the green deal, as European states will be pioneering in implementing new standards in climate protection policies that will affect certain sectors of the economy. Rethinking the national security agenda will certainly face aspects which impose the protection of certain sectors that have a higher negative impact over climate change.","PeriodicalId":258995,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Oeconomica","volume":"385 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis. Seria Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amso-2020-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 crisis, undoubtedly, raised a series of questions concerning aspects of national and human security. The crisis impact, per se, tested, in extremis, the medical systems and the political capacity to take swift decisions needed to protect the population. It is a general accepted thesis that the world will face a second wave of effects: economic and systemic. Regarding the last aspect, the current international system is constructed around many principles among them, relevant for our research are, global governance and national sovereignty. The manner in which the two concepts operate was tested during the pandemic. On one hand the international system of global governance failed to ensure a higher level of human security when facing a crisis. On the other hand, states were left to tackle the effects of the pandemic, more or less alone, as the entire international system was paralyzed. In this context state had to turn to classic concepts of national security, egocentric and protectionist, but needed to ensure one of its fundamental functions – providing the security of its citizens. As others crisis are expected to unfold in a domino like effect, redefining national security will be essential for states and regional organizations. But in this process decisions could collide with assumed international obligations. In this context the article explores this impact of the COVID 19 over the how states define their national security concepts. In this context a special attention will be given, as an example, to the industry sector in the context of the green deal, as European states will be pioneering in implementing new standards in climate protection policies that will affect certain sectors of the economy. Rethinking the national security agenda will certainly face aspects which impose the protection of certain sectors that have a higher negative impact over climate change.
在后COVID - 19背景下重塑欧洲和国家安全
新冠肺炎疫情无疑引发了一系列关乎国家安全与人类安全的问题。危机本身的影响,在极端情况下,考验了医疗系统和迅速作出保护民众所需决定的政治能力。人们普遍认为,世界将面临第二波影响:经济和系统影响。关于最后一个方面,当前的国际体系是围绕着许多原则构建的,其中与我们的研究相关的是全球治理和国家主权。这两个概念的运作方式在大流行期间得到了检验。一方面,全球治理的国际体系在面临危机时无法确保更高水平的人类安全。另一方面,由于整个国际体系陷入瘫痪,各国不得不或多或少地独自应对疫情的影响。在这种情况下,国家不得不求助于国家安全、自我中心和保护主义的经典概念,但需要确保其基本职能之一- -提供其公民的安全。随着其他危机预计将以多米诺骨牌效应展开,重新定义国家安全对国家和地区组织至关重要。但在这一过程中,决策可能与假定的国际义务发生冲突。在此背景下,本文探讨了COVID - 19对各国如何定义其国家安全概念的影响。在此背景下,作为一个例子,将特别关注绿色协议背景下的工业部门,因为欧洲国家将率先实施影响某些经济部门的气候保护政策的新标准。重新思考国家安全议程肯定会面临对某些对气候变化有较大负面影响的部门施加保护的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信