Comparison of Shared Reading versus Emergent Reading: How the Two Provide Distinct Opportunities for Early Literacy

ISRN Education Pub Date : 2013-05-02 DOI:10.1155/2013/936191
S. Curenton, Symonne S. Kennedy
{"title":"Comparison of Shared Reading versus Emergent Reading: How the Two Provide Distinct Opportunities for Early Literacy","authors":"S. Curenton, Symonne S. Kennedy","doi":"10.1155/2013/936191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined mother-child interactions across two types of reading interactions—shared reading versus emergent reading—in order to determine (a) if mothers and children provide the same amount of language input across the two interactions, (b) if the socioemotional quality is consistent across the interactions, and (c) if the language input and socioemotional quality across the two interactions are differentially associated with children’s scores on early literacy assessments. Twenty-five mother-child dyads participated in both interactions. Children were given a standardized test of early reading and an emergent reading score based on a rubric designed particularly for the book they were reading. Results indicated that during the shared reading mothers provided more language input (i.e., they talked more), but children increased their amount of talk during the emergent reading, making such input effects null. Overall, socioemotional quality was consistent across the two interactions, except mothers provide more literacy feedback during shared reading. Both language input and socioemotional quality were associated with higher scores on early literacy assessments, but the contribution of these factors varied depending across the type of reading interaction. Results are discussed in terms of education implications for literacy practices at home and school.","PeriodicalId":202265,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/936191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study examined mother-child interactions across two types of reading interactions—shared reading versus emergent reading—in order to determine (a) if mothers and children provide the same amount of language input across the two interactions, (b) if the socioemotional quality is consistent across the interactions, and (c) if the language input and socioemotional quality across the two interactions are differentially associated with children’s scores on early literacy assessments. Twenty-five mother-child dyads participated in both interactions. Children were given a standardized test of early reading and an emergent reading score based on a rubric designed particularly for the book they were reading. Results indicated that during the shared reading mothers provided more language input (i.e., they talked more), but children increased their amount of talk during the emergent reading, making such input effects null. Overall, socioemotional quality was consistent across the two interactions, except mothers provide more literacy feedback during shared reading. Both language input and socioemotional quality were associated with higher scores on early literacy assessments, but the contribution of these factors varied depending across the type of reading interaction. Results are discussed in terms of education implications for literacy practices at home and school.
共享阅读与即兴阅读的比较:两者如何为早期读写提供不同的机会
本研究考察了两种类型的阅读互动——共享阅读和紧急阅读——的母子互动,以确定(a)母亲和孩子在两种互动中是否提供相同数量的语言输入,(b)社会情感质量在两种互动中是否一致,以及(c)两种互动中的语言输入和社会情感质量是否与儿童早期读写能力评估的分数存在差异。25对母子二人组参与了这两种互动。孩子们接受了一个标准化的早期阅读测试,并根据专门为他们正在阅读的书设计的标题给出了一个紧急阅读分数。结果表明,在共享阅读过程中,母亲提供了更多的语言输入(即更多的说话),但在紧急阅读过程中,儿童增加了说话量,使得这种输入效应无效。总的来说,除了母亲在共同阅读中提供更多的读写反馈外,两种互动中的社会情感质量是一致的。语言输入和社会情感质量都与早期读写能力评估的高分有关,但这些因素的贡献因阅读互动的类型而异。结果讨论了在教育方面的含义在家庭和学校扫盲实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信