Social networking as an eHealth tool: Its usage by Canadian physicians and patients

W. Farhan, Jamil Razmak
{"title":"Social networking as an eHealth tool: Its usage by Canadian physicians and patients","authors":"W. Farhan, Jamil Razmak","doi":"10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social networks used for health-related services can either support or hinder the adoption of Canadian ehealth strategies. Assessing the Canadian usage of ehealth services, including social networks, was the main objective of the present study, which used secondary data from the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Health Infoway. Responses from 2,071 physicians and 1,017 patients were analysed using SPSS. The results indicated that 99.8% of Canadian physicians did not use social networks, while 14% of Canadian patients did report using them. Using Chi-square analysis, we found significant differences in social network use among patients according to age, gender, and employment status. Effective and careful engagement in social networks encouraged by Canadian health policy makers for both physicians and patients, the spread of correct and trusted health-related information, and the provision of trusted communication channels on social network sites benefit both public and private healthcare institutions, and can support and boost the achievements of the desired ehealth goals.","PeriodicalId":371668,"journal":{"name":"2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social networks used for health-related services can either support or hinder the adoption of Canadian ehealth strategies. Assessing the Canadian usage of ehealth services, including social networks, was the main objective of the present study, which used secondary data from the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Health Infoway. Responses from 2,071 physicians and 1,017 patients were analysed using SPSS. The results indicated that 99.8% of Canadian physicians did not use social networks, while 14% of Canadian patients did report using them. Using Chi-square analysis, we found significant differences in social network use among patients according to age, gender, and employment status. Effective and careful engagement in social networks encouraged by Canadian health policy makers for both physicians and patients, the spread of correct and trusted health-related information, and the provision of trusted communication channels on social network sites benefit both public and private healthcare institutions, and can support and boost the achievements of the desired ehealth goals.
社交网络作为电子健康工具:加拿大医生和患者的使用情况
用于健康相关服务的社交网络既可以支持也可以阻碍加拿大电子卫生战略的采用。评估加拿大人对包括社交网络在内的电子保健服务的使用情况是本研究的主要目的,本研究使用了来自加拿大医学协会和加拿大卫生信息网的二手数据。使用SPSS对2071名医生和1017名患者的反馈进行了分析。结果表明,99.8%的加拿大医生不使用社交网络,而14%的加拿大患者报告使用社交网络。通过卡方分析,我们发现不同年龄、性别和就业状况的患者在社交网络使用方面存在显著差异。加拿大卫生政策制定者鼓励医生和患者有效和谨慎地参与社会网络,传播正确和可信的健康相关信息,并在社会网络网站上提供可信的沟通渠道,这对公共和私营卫生保健机构都有好处,可以支持和促进实现期望的电子卫生目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信