{"title":"Patent Demands & Startup Companies: The View from the Venture Capital Community","authors":"Robin C. Feldman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2346338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a study of patent demands against venture-backed startups, conducted through members of the National Venture Capital Association and their portfolio companies. The results of surveying 200 venture capitalists and their portfolio companies provide strong indications of the impact that patent demands are having on the venture-backed community. Both the companies and the venture capitalists overwhelming believe that patent demands have a negative impact on the venture-backed community, with all or most of those assertions coming from entities whose core activity involves licensing or litigating patents. These impacts are described in terms of the specific costs expended by the companies and by the distraction to management, engineers, and other employees. Most important, participants described the human toll that patent demands have had on entrepreneurs. In addition, when making funding decisions, the vast majority of venture capitalists do not consider the potential for selling to assertion entities if the company fails. On the flip side, 100% of venture capitalists indicated that if a company had an existing patent demand against it, it could potentially be a major deterrent in deciding whether to invest.Finally, one venture capitalist provided an excellent summary of the impact of patent demands on venture-backed companies. When companies spend money trying to protect their intellectual property position, they are not expanding; and when companies spend time thinking about patent demands, they are not inventing.","PeriodicalId":126321,"journal":{"name":"UC Hastings Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UC Hastings Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2346338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
This paper presents a study of patent demands against venture-backed startups, conducted through members of the National Venture Capital Association and their portfolio companies. The results of surveying 200 venture capitalists and their portfolio companies provide strong indications of the impact that patent demands are having on the venture-backed community. Both the companies and the venture capitalists overwhelming believe that patent demands have a negative impact on the venture-backed community, with all or most of those assertions coming from entities whose core activity involves licensing or litigating patents. These impacts are described in terms of the specific costs expended by the companies and by the distraction to management, engineers, and other employees. Most important, participants described the human toll that patent demands have had on entrepreneurs. In addition, when making funding decisions, the vast majority of venture capitalists do not consider the potential for selling to assertion entities if the company fails. On the flip side, 100% of venture capitalists indicated that if a company had an existing patent demand against it, it could potentially be a major deterrent in deciding whether to invest.Finally, one venture capitalist provided an excellent summary of the impact of patent demands on venture-backed companies. When companies spend money trying to protect their intellectual property position, they are not expanding; and when companies spend time thinking about patent demands, they are not inventing.
本文通过美国风险投资协会(National Venture Capital Association)的成员及其投资组合公司,对风险投资支持的初创企业的专利要求进行了研究。对200名风险资本家及其投资组合公司的调查结果有力地表明,专利要求正在对风险投资支持的行业产生影响。公司和风险投资家都认为,专利需求对风险投资支持的社区有负面影响,所有或大部分这些断言都来自核心活动涉及专利许可或诉讼的实体。这些影响是根据公司所花费的具体成本以及对管理层、工程师和其他员工的干扰来描述的。最重要的是,与会者描述了专利要求对企业家造成的人员伤亡。此外,在做出融资决策时,绝大多数风险投资家不会考虑如果公司倒闭,将其出售给主张实体的可能性。另一方面,100%的风险投资家表示,如果一家公司面临现有的专利要求,这可能会成为决定是否投资的主要障碍。最后,一位风险投资家对专利要求对风险投资公司的影响做了一个很好的总结。当企业花钱试图保护自己的知识产权地位时,它们就不会扩张;当公司花时间考虑专利需求时,他们就不是在发明。