Bank Earnings Management Using Loan Loss Provisions: Comparing the UK, France, South Africa and Egypt

Peterson K. Ozili
{"title":"Bank Earnings Management Using Loan Loss Provisions: Comparing the UK, France, South Africa and Egypt","authors":"Peterson K. Ozili","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3875404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate bank earnings management using loan loss provision. The paper examines income smoothing, which is a type of earnings management. It compares the income smoothing behaviour of banks in the UK, France, South Africa and Egypt.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the panel fixed effect regression methodology to analyse bank income smoothing.FindingsThe findings show that bank income smoothing is present in the UK and Egypt and absent in France and South Africa. Banks in Egypt used LLPs to smooth income before the global financial crisis. Meanwhile, bank income smoothing is pronounced in France during and after the financial crisis but was absent in the pre-crisis period. Also, bank income smoothing is reduced in countries that (1) have strict banking supervision, (2) adopt common law particularly the United Kingdom, and by countries that adopt civil law, particularly France and Egypt. Bank earnings management is greater in countries that (3) adopt a mixed legal system, particularly South Africa, and in countries that adopt International Financial Reporting Standards accounting standards.Research limitations/implicationsThe implication of the findings is that country differences may affect banks' incentive to smooth income using loan loss provision.Originality/valueThe novelty of this paper is that it explicitly analyses specific countries that have different supervisory regimes, different structure and accounting rules.","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":" 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to investigate bank earnings management using loan loss provision. The paper examines income smoothing, which is a type of earnings management. It compares the income smoothing behaviour of banks in the UK, France, South Africa and Egypt.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the panel fixed effect regression methodology to analyse bank income smoothing.FindingsThe findings show that bank income smoothing is present in the UK and Egypt and absent in France and South Africa. Banks in Egypt used LLPs to smooth income before the global financial crisis. Meanwhile, bank income smoothing is pronounced in France during and after the financial crisis but was absent in the pre-crisis period. Also, bank income smoothing is reduced in countries that (1) have strict banking supervision, (2) adopt common law particularly the United Kingdom, and by countries that adopt civil law, particularly France and Egypt. Bank earnings management is greater in countries that (3) adopt a mixed legal system, particularly South Africa, and in countries that adopt International Financial Reporting Standards accounting standards.Research limitations/implicationsThe implication of the findings is that country differences may affect banks' incentive to smooth income using loan loss provision.Originality/valueThe novelty of this paper is that it explicitly analyses specific countries that have different supervisory regimes, different structure and accounting rules.
基于贷款损失准备的银行盈余管理:比较英国、法国、南非和埃及
目的探讨利用贷款损失计提进行银行盈余管理。收益平滑是盈余管理的一种。它比较了英国、法国、南非和埃及银行的收入平滑行为。设计/方法/方法本研究采用面板固定效应回归方法分析银行收入平滑。研究结果显示,银行收入平滑在英国和埃及存在,而在法国和南非则不存在。在全球金融危机之前,埃及的银行利用有限责任合伙来稳定收入。与此同时,法国银行收入平滑在金融危机期间和之后都很明显,但在危机前却不存在。此外,在以下国家(1)有严格的银行监管,(2)采用普通法(特别是英国)和采用民法(特别是法国和埃及)的国家,银行收入平滑度降低。在(3)采用混合法律制度的国家,特别是南非,以及采用国际财务报告准则会计准则的国家,银行盈余管理更大。研究局限/启示研究结果的含义是,国家差异可能会影响银行使用贷款损失拨备来平滑收入的动机。本文的新颖之处在于,它明确地分析了具有不同监管制度、不同结构和会计规则的具体国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信