Tag, cloud and ontology based retrieval of images

J. Bar-Ilan, M. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Y. Miller, Snunith Shoham
{"title":"Tag, cloud and ontology based retrieval of images","authors":"J. Bar-Ilan, M. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Y. Miller, Snunith Shoham","doi":"10.1145/1840784.1840798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we describe the results of an experiment designed to compare different user interfaces for retrieving tagged images from a database comprised of images of Jewish cultural heritage. The participants were given ten scenarios, for which they were asked to retrieve all the relevant images in the database. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of four retrieval interfaces: tag search in a search box; faceted tag search in a search box, selecting terms from the tag cloud of all the tags in the database and selecting concepts from an ontology created from the tags assigned to the images. Each interface was tested by 21 users. The results show that the highest recall on average was achieved by users of the ontology interface, for seven out of the ten tasks, however users were more satisfied with the textbox based search than the cloud or the ontology. Differences between the precision values were small (less than 10%), but none of the interfaces clearly outdid the others. In terms of recall, on average there was a 27% difference between the group achieving the highest and lowest recall.","PeriodicalId":413481,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the results of an experiment designed to compare different user interfaces for retrieving tagged images from a database comprised of images of Jewish cultural heritage. The participants were given ten scenarios, for which they were asked to retrieve all the relevant images in the database. Each participant was randomly assigned to one of four retrieval interfaces: tag search in a search box; faceted tag search in a search box, selecting terms from the tag cloud of all the tags in the database and selecting concepts from an ontology created from the tags assigned to the images. Each interface was tested by 21 users. The results show that the highest recall on average was achieved by users of the ontology interface, for seven out of the ten tasks, however users were more satisfied with the textbox based search than the cloud or the ontology. Differences between the precision values were small (less than 10%), but none of the interfaces clearly outdid the others. In terms of recall, on average there was a 27% difference between the group achieving the highest and lowest recall.
基于标签、云和本体的图像检索
在本文中,我们描述了一项实验的结果,该实验旨在比较从犹太文化遗产图像数据库中检索标记图像的不同用户界面。参与者被分配了10个场景,他们被要求在数据库中检索所有相关的图像。每个参与者被随机分配到四种检索界面中的一种:在搜索框中搜索标签;在搜索框中进行分面标记搜索,从数据库中所有标记的标记云中选择术语,并从从分配给图像的标记创建的本体中选择概念。每个界面由21个用户进行测试。结果表明,用户对10个任务中的7个任务的平均召回率最高,但用户对基于文本框的搜索比基于云或本体的搜索更满意。精度值之间的差异很小(小于10%),但没有一个接口明显优于其他接口。在回忆方面,最高回忆组和最低回忆组之间平均有27%的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信