An Anti-anthropic Approach to ‘Humanitas’ -A Realism on the Era of Post-Humanism

Mingyu Seo
{"title":"An Anti-anthropic Approach to ‘Humanitas’\n-A Realism on the Era of Post-Humanism","authors":"Mingyu Seo","doi":"10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reconsider the norm of ‘humanitas’ that the liberal education pursues from the perspective of 21st century post-humanism. For the outcome of this reconsideration, I suggest an alternative view point about what we need regarding ‘humanitas’ at this time. The concept of ‘humanitas’ and its value to the world was coined and founded during the ancient Greek and Roman period, and after the Medieval period, which saw the rise of Christianity, it was revitalized with the movement of the Renaissance. However, I insist that humans entered a barbaric and disastrous stage at this time instead of one that led to an increase in humanitas. This is made all the more clear when we examine human history and the system that has led us into an ecological crisis after the advent of the 20th century. The 21st century of post-humanism is the era in which humans live with the new existences that never been experienced. The era of post-humanism needs to undergo a paradigm shift from anthropocentrism to ontocentrism. When we do not share the crucial values promulgated by ‘humanitas’ with our newly evolved non-anthropic existences, we are doomed to continue walk down a barbaric and disastrous path.","PeriodicalId":267224,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of General Education","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to reconsider the norm of ‘humanitas’ that the liberal education pursues from the perspective of 21st century post-humanism. For the outcome of this reconsideration, I suggest an alternative view point about what we need regarding ‘humanitas’ at this time. The concept of ‘humanitas’ and its value to the world was coined and founded during the ancient Greek and Roman period, and after the Medieval period, which saw the rise of Christianity, it was revitalized with the movement of the Renaissance. However, I insist that humans entered a barbaric and disastrous stage at this time instead of one that led to an increase in humanitas. This is made all the more clear when we examine human history and the system that has led us into an ecological crisis after the advent of the 20th century. The 21st century of post-humanism is the era in which humans live with the new existences that never been experienced. The era of post-humanism needs to undergo a paradigm shift from anthropocentrism to ontocentrism. When we do not share the crucial values promulgated by ‘humanitas’ with our newly evolved non-anthropic existences, we are doomed to continue walk down a barbaric and disastrous path.
“人道主义”的反人类之道——后人道主义时代的现实主义
本研究旨在从21世纪后人文主义的视角重新审视博雅教育所追求的“人文主义”规范。对于这种重新考虑的结果,我提出了另一种观点,即我们在这个时候需要什么关于“人道主义”。“人道主义”的概念及其对世界的价值是在古希腊和罗马时期创造和建立的,在基督教兴起的中世纪之后,它随着文艺复兴运动而重新焕发活力。然而,我坚持认为人类在这个时候进入了一个野蛮和灾难性的阶段,而不是一个导致人道主义增加的阶段。当我们审视人类历史和在20世纪到来后导致我们陷入生态危机的制度时,这一点就变得更加清楚了。后人文主义的21世纪是人类从未体验过的新存在的时代。后人文主义时代需要经历从人类中心主义到本体中心主义的范式转变。当我们不把“人道主义”所宣扬的关键价值观与我们新进化的非人类存在分享时,我们注定要继续走在野蛮和灾难性的道路上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信