DIAPHRAGM-PROTECTIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN CHILDREN

О. В. Філик, Я. М. Підгірний
{"title":"DIAPHRAGM-PROTECTIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN CHILDREN","authors":"О. В. Філик, Я. М. Підгірний","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.2(91).2020.205602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . Mechanical ventilation can lead to diaphragm injury. The aim of the study was to investigate thickness of diaphragm, it thicknening fraction and to compare the results of treatment in group of patients with lung-protective mechanical ventilation and in group where we used the combination of lung-protective and diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation. Materials and methods. We conduct prospective, randomized, non-interventional, single-center controlled trial among patients 1 month to 18 years old. In the data analysis 31 patients of control group (lung-protective mechanical ventilation) and 27 patients of study group (lung-protective and diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation) were included in data analysis. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation, frequency of complications (reintubation, tracheostomy), dynamics of thicknening fraction of diaphragm. Results . It was tendency to decreasing the fraction of thickening of right hemidiaphragm from 31.1% to 28.6% during the d1 - d3 stages of study in control group, while in study group this fraction increased from 25% to 32.65%. Fraction of thickening of left hemidiaphragm in control group at stage d1 was 22.5 [16.7; 35]; at stage d3 increased up to 24.55 [10.8; 53.33], and at stage d5 - up to 39.3 [24.73; 52,98]. In study group of patients it was 19 [11; 41,45] at stage d1 (p = 0,311 for control and study groups); increased up to 27.3 [14.3; 38.7] (p = 0.329) at stage d3; and exceeded the recommended by diaphragm-protective strategy of mechanical ventilation values at stage d5 and was 64 [36; 78,9] (p = 0.049), what we can be interpreted as a marker of diaphragm overload. The duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation in control group was 8 days [4 days; 19.5 days], in study group - 9 days [5.5 days; 19.75 days], (p = 0.77). Conclusion . The 28-day mortality rate was higher in control group in comparison with study group (9.7% and 3.7%, respectively, p = 0.29). The incidence of complications in control group of patients was lower in comparison with study group (7.1% and 26.9%, respectively, p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation in both groups. Trial registration : ISRCTN registry. Identifier: ISRCTN84734652.","PeriodicalId":355172,"journal":{"name":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.2(91).2020.205602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background . Mechanical ventilation can lead to diaphragm injury. The aim of the study was to investigate thickness of diaphragm, it thicknening fraction and to compare the results of treatment in group of patients with lung-protective mechanical ventilation and in group where we used the combination of lung-protective and diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation. Materials and methods. We conduct prospective, randomized, non-interventional, single-center controlled trial among patients 1 month to 18 years old. In the data analysis 31 patients of control group (lung-protective mechanical ventilation) and 27 patients of study group (lung-protective and diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation) were included in data analysis. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation, frequency of complications (reintubation, tracheostomy), dynamics of thicknening fraction of diaphragm. Results . It was tendency to decreasing the fraction of thickening of right hemidiaphragm from 31.1% to 28.6% during the d1 - d3 stages of study in control group, while in study group this fraction increased from 25% to 32.65%. Fraction of thickening of left hemidiaphragm in control group at stage d1 was 22.5 [16.7; 35]; at stage d3 increased up to 24.55 [10.8; 53.33], and at stage d5 - up to 39.3 [24.73; 52,98]. In study group of patients it was 19 [11; 41,45] at stage d1 (p = 0,311 for control and study groups); increased up to 27.3 [14.3; 38.7] (p = 0.329) at stage d3; and exceeded the recommended by diaphragm-protective strategy of mechanical ventilation values at stage d5 and was 64 [36; 78,9] (p = 0.049), what we can be interpreted as a marker of diaphragm overload. The duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation in control group was 8 days [4 days; 19.5 days], in study group - 9 days [5.5 days; 19.75 days], (p = 0.77). Conclusion . The 28-day mortality rate was higher in control group in comparison with study group (9.7% and 3.7%, respectively, p = 0.29). The incidence of complications in control group of patients was lower in comparison with study group (7.1% and 26.9%, respectively, p = 0.06). There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation in both groups. Trial registration : ISRCTN registry. Identifier: ISRCTN84734652.
儿童膈膜保护性机械通气
背景。机械通气可导致膈肌损伤。本研究的目的是观察肺保护性机械通气组和肺保护性与膈保护性机械通气联合使用组的膈膜厚度、增厚分数,并比较其治疗效果。材料和方法。我们对1个月至18岁的患者进行前瞻性、随机、非介入性、单中心对照试验。在数据分析中,对照组(肺保护机械通气)31例,研究组(肺保护和膈保护机械通气)27例。主要终点是28天死亡率。次要结果是机械通气的脱机时间,并发症(重新插管,气管切开术)的频率,隔膜增厚分数的动态。结果。在d1 ~ d3阶段,对照组右半膈增厚率有从31.1%下降到28.6%的趋势,而研究组右半膈增厚率从25%上升到32.65%。对照组d1期左膈增厚率为22.5 [16.7;35);d3期增加到24.55 [10.8];53.33],在d5阶段-高达39.3 [24.73];52岁,98]。研究组患者为19例[11;[41,45]在d1阶段(对照组和研究组p = 0,311);增加到27.3 [14.3;38.7] (p = 0.329);并且超过了d5阶段膈膜保护策略推荐的机械通气值,为64 [36];78,9] (p = 0.049),我们可以将其解释为隔膜过载的标志。对照组机械通气脱机时间为8 d [4 d;19.5天],研究组- 9天[5.5天;19.75天],(p = 0.77)。结论。对照组28天死亡率高于研究组(分别为9.7%和3.7%,p = 0.29)。对照组患者并发症发生率低于研究组(分别为7.1%和26.9%,p = 0.06)。两组患者机械通气时间差异无统计学意义。试验注册:ISRCTN注册。标识符:ISRCTN84734652。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信