NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR VORTEX SHEET INTENSITY COMPUTATION IN VORTEX METHODS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CURVILINEARITY OF THE AIRFOIL SURFACE LINE

K. Kuzmina, I. Marchevsky
{"title":"NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR VORTEX SHEET INTENSITY COMPUTATION IN VORTEX METHODS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CURVILINEARITY OF THE AIRFOIL SURFACE LINE","authors":"K. Kuzmina, I. Marchevsky","doi":"10.2495/BE420241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In vortex methods, vorticity is the primary computed variable. The problem of the accuracy improvement of vorticity generation simulation at the airfoil surface line in 2D vortex methods is considered. The generated vorticity is simulated by a thin vortex sheet at the airfoil surface line, and it is necessary to determine the intensity of this sheet at each time step. It can be found from the no-slip boundary condition, which leads to a vector boundary integral equation. There are two approaches to satisfy this equation: the first one leads to a singular integral equation of the 1st kind, while the second one leads to a Fredholm-type integral equation of the 2nd kind with bounded kernel for smooth airfoils. Usually, for numerical solution of the boundary integral equation, the airfoil surface line is replaced by a polygon, which consists of straight segments (panels). A discrete analogue of the integral equation can be obtained using the Galerkin method. Different families of basis and projection functions lead to numerical schemes with different complexity and accuracy. For example, a numerical scheme with piecewise-constant basis functions provides the first order of accuracy for vortex sheet intensity, and a numerical scheme with piecewise-linear functions gives the second order of accuracy. However, the velocity field near the airfoil surface line is also of interest. In the case of rectilinear airfoil surface line discretization, the accuracy of velocity field reconstruction has no more than the first order of accuracy for both, piecewise-constant and piecewise-linear numerical schemes. In order to obtain a higher order of accuracy for velocity field reconstruction, it is necessary to take into account the curvilinearity of the airfoil surface line. In this research, we have developed such an approach, which provides the second order of accuracy both, for vortex sheet intensity computation and velocity field reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":429597,"journal":{"name":"Boundary Elements and other Mesh Reduction Methods XLII","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary Elements and other Mesh Reduction Methods XLII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/BE420241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vortex methods, vorticity is the primary computed variable. The problem of the accuracy improvement of vorticity generation simulation at the airfoil surface line in 2D vortex methods is considered. The generated vorticity is simulated by a thin vortex sheet at the airfoil surface line, and it is necessary to determine the intensity of this sheet at each time step. It can be found from the no-slip boundary condition, which leads to a vector boundary integral equation. There are two approaches to satisfy this equation: the first one leads to a singular integral equation of the 1st kind, while the second one leads to a Fredholm-type integral equation of the 2nd kind with bounded kernel for smooth airfoils. Usually, for numerical solution of the boundary integral equation, the airfoil surface line is replaced by a polygon, which consists of straight segments (panels). A discrete analogue of the integral equation can be obtained using the Galerkin method. Different families of basis and projection functions lead to numerical schemes with different complexity and accuracy. For example, a numerical scheme with piecewise-constant basis functions provides the first order of accuracy for vortex sheet intensity, and a numerical scheme with piecewise-linear functions gives the second order of accuracy. However, the velocity field near the airfoil surface line is also of interest. In the case of rectilinear airfoil surface line discretization, the accuracy of velocity field reconstruction has no more than the first order of accuracy for both, piecewise-constant and piecewise-linear numerical schemes. In order to obtain a higher order of accuracy for velocity field reconstruction, it is necessary to take into account the curvilinearity of the airfoil surface line. In this research, we have developed such an approach, which provides the second order of accuracy both, for vortex sheet intensity computation and velocity field reconstruction.
考虑翼型表面曲线的旋涡法中旋涡片强度计算的数值格式
在涡旋方法中,涡度是主要的计算变量。考虑了二维涡旋方法中翼型表面涡度产生模拟精度的提高问题。在翼型表面线上用薄涡片模拟涡量,需要确定每个时间步长薄涡片的强度。它可以由无滑移边界条件得到,从而得到一个矢量边界积分方程。有两种方法来满足这个方程:第一种导致一个奇异积分方程的第一类,而第二个导致一个fredholm型积分方程的第二类有界核光滑翼型。通常,对于边界积分方程的数值解,翼型表面线被一个多边形取代,它由直段(面板)组成。用伽辽金方法可以得到积分方程的离散模拟。不同的基族和投影函数导致不同的数值格式具有不同的复杂性和精度。例如,具有分段常数基函数的数值格式提供了涡片强度的一级精度,而具有分段线性函数的数值格式提供了二级精度。然而,速度场附近的翼型表面线也是感兴趣的。在直线翼型曲面线离散的情况下,无论是分段常数格式还是分段线性格式,速度场重建的精度都不超过一阶精度。为了获得更高阶精度的速度场重建,有必要考虑翼型表面线的曲线。在本研究中,我们开发了这样一种方法,为涡片强度计算和速度场重建提供了二级精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信