BOOK 6

The Aeneid Pub Date : 2019-10-15 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvnwc0pv.10
U. Riehm, K. Böhle, R. Lindner
{"title":"BOOK 6","authors":"U. Riehm, K. Böhle, R. Lindner","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvnwc0pv.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"buero@tab-beim-bundestag.de www.tab-beim-bundestag.de In recent years, electronic petition systems have found widespread use. They ensure both the publication of petition texts and the collection of supporting signatures. Moreover, advanced systems enable online discussions concerning the respective petition. Parliaments and governments are making increasingly use of this instrument of political participation and protection of the citizens‘ interests vis-à-vis the executive power. At the turn of the millennium, the Scottish parliament was one of the pioneers with regard to parliamentary petition portals. The active participation of citizens in the entire petition ing process was one of the guiding principles of the Scottish e-petition system which attracted attention worldwide and has been taken up elsewhere. Since 2005, the Scottish model has been adopted and further developed by the German Bundestag. In many European parliaments, reform processes regarding the modernization of petitioning systems can be observed. On behalf of the German Parliament, the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag has examined the functional change of the parliamentary petition system in Germany in the course of the introduction of public electronic petitions and has shown a differentiated picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the currently applied system. The view of the German situation is complemented by a country study regarding the petitioning systems applied in Great-Britain including the Scottish one. The volume is completed by an overview of the petitions procedures provided by the European national parliaments and ombudsman institutions. Ulrich Riehm Knud Böhle Ralf Lindner","PeriodicalId":206322,"journal":{"name":"The Aeneid","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Aeneid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvnwc0pv.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

buero@tab-beim-bundestag.de www.tab-beim-bundestag.de In recent years, electronic petition systems have found widespread use. They ensure both the publication of petition texts and the collection of supporting signatures. Moreover, advanced systems enable online discussions concerning the respective petition. Parliaments and governments are making increasingly use of this instrument of political participation and protection of the citizens‘ interests vis-à-vis the executive power. At the turn of the millennium, the Scottish parliament was one of the pioneers with regard to parliamentary petition portals. The active participation of citizens in the entire petition ing process was one of the guiding principles of the Scottish e-petition system which attracted attention worldwide and has been taken up elsewhere. Since 2005, the Scottish model has been adopted and further developed by the German Bundestag. In many European parliaments, reform processes regarding the modernization of petitioning systems can be observed. On behalf of the German Parliament, the Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag has examined the functional change of the parliamentary petition system in Germany in the course of the introduction of public electronic petitions and has shown a differentiated picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the currently applied system. The view of the German situation is complemented by a country study regarding the petitioning systems applied in Great-Britain including the Scottish one. The volume is completed by an overview of the petitions procedures provided by the European national parliaments and ombudsman institutions. Ulrich Riehm Knud Böhle Ralf Lindner
书6
buero@tab-beim-bundestag.de www.tab-beim-bundestag.de近年来,电子信访系统得到了广泛的应用。他们确保请愿文本的出版和支持签名的收集。此外,先进的系统使在线讨论有关各自的请愿。议会和政府越来越多地利用这一政治参与和保护公民利益的工具来对抗-à-vis行政权力。在世纪之交,苏格兰议会是议会请愿门户的先驱之一。公民积极参与整个请愿过程是苏格兰电子请愿系统的指导原则之一,该系统引起了全世界的注意,并已在其他地方采用。自2005年以来,苏格兰模式被德国联邦议院采纳并进一步发展。在许多欧洲议会中,可以看到有关请愿制度现代化的改革进程。德国联邦议院的技术评估办公室代表德国议会审查了在引进公共电子请愿过程中德国议会请愿制度的功能变化,并显示了目前应用的制度的长处和弱点的不同情况。一项关于大不列颠(包括苏格兰)适用的请愿制度的国别研究补充了对德国情况的看法。本卷最后概述了欧洲各国议会和申诉专员机构提供的申诉程序。Ulrich Riehm Knud Böhle ralph Lindner
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信