C-DMr: Crowd-powered Decision Maker for real world Knapsack Problems

Leihao Xia, Caleb Chen Cao, Lei Chen, Zhao Chen
{"title":"C-DMr: Crowd-powered Decision Maker for real world Knapsack Problems","authors":"Leihao Xia, Caleb Chen Cao, Lei Chen, Zhao Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knapsack problems range over a large sphere of real world challenges [?]. For example, every year a professor has to decide her new “squad” of students/staff from possibly hundreds of candidates, while having a restricted budget of funding in consideration. Moreover, in many cases, she has to resort to her colleagues and senior students to make comparisons among the candidates. The difficulties of such tasks are mainly three-fold: 1) the knowledge about the candidates are distributed among a crowd; 2) the underlying factors are human-intrinsic and hard to be formatted; 3) the size of candidates exceeds the capacity of human for a one-shot decision. Other examples in this category include gear set preparation for a venture trip, syllabus design for a popular course and inventory design for goods shelf, where the two difficulties are commonly observed. Consequently, a person may be heavily entangled to work out a final decision, which may even be inaccurate. Driven by this demand, in this demo, we present C-DMr - a Crowd-powered Decision Maker that incorporates the wisdom of the informed crowds to solve such real world Knapsack Problems. The core module of this web-based system is a set of algorithms along with a novel interactive interface. The interface incrementally presents comparison jobs and motivates the crowd to participate with a rewarding mechanism, and the set of algorithms solves the Knapsack Problem given only pairwise preferences among candidates. We demonstrate the novelty and usefulness of C-DMr by forming a aforementioned “squad” for a recruiting professor. Specifically four functionalities are shown: 1) a Candidates Entrance that collects the information about all candidates; 2) a Jury Trial that facilitates informed crowds to contribute preferences; 3) an Knapsack Analyzer that measures the on-going “squad”; and 4) a Consultant that recommends a final set of candidates to the professor.","PeriodicalId":159130,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Knapsack problems range over a large sphere of real world challenges [?]. For example, every year a professor has to decide her new “squad” of students/staff from possibly hundreds of candidates, while having a restricted budget of funding in consideration. Moreover, in many cases, she has to resort to her colleagues and senior students to make comparisons among the candidates. The difficulties of such tasks are mainly three-fold: 1) the knowledge about the candidates are distributed among a crowd; 2) the underlying factors are human-intrinsic and hard to be formatted; 3) the size of candidates exceeds the capacity of human for a one-shot decision. Other examples in this category include gear set preparation for a venture trip, syllabus design for a popular course and inventory design for goods shelf, where the two difficulties are commonly observed. Consequently, a person may be heavily entangled to work out a final decision, which may even be inaccurate. Driven by this demand, in this demo, we present C-DMr - a Crowd-powered Decision Maker that incorporates the wisdom of the informed crowds to solve such real world Knapsack Problems. The core module of this web-based system is a set of algorithms along with a novel interactive interface. The interface incrementally presents comparison jobs and motivates the crowd to participate with a rewarding mechanism, and the set of algorithms solves the Knapsack Problem given only pairwise preferences among candidates. We demonstrate the novelty and usefulness of C-DMr by forming a aforementioned “squad” for a recruiting professor. Specifically four functionalities are shown: 1) a Candidates Entrance that collects the information about all candidates; 2) a Jury Trial that facilitates informed crowds to contribute preferences; 3) an Knapsack Analyzer that measures the on-going “squad”; and 4) a Consultant that recommends a final set of candidates to the professor.
C-DMr:现实世界背包问题的群众动力决策者
背包问题涵盖了现实世界挑战的一个大范围。例如,每年一位教授都必须从数百名候选人中决定她的新“团队”,同时考虑到有限的资金预算。此外,在很多情况下,她不得不求助于她的同事和高年级学生来比较候选人。这类任务的难点主要有三个方面:1)候选人的信息是分散在人群中的;2)深层次因素是人为因素,难以格式化;3)候选人的规模超过了人类一次性决策的能力。这一类别的例子还包括为一次冒险旅行准备装备、为一门热门课程设计教学大纲和为货架设计存货,这两种困难在这里是常见的。因此,一个人在做出最后的决定时可能会非常纠结,甚至可能是不准确的。在这种需求的推动下,在这个演示中,我们展示了C-DMr——一个由人群驱动的决策者,它结合了知情人群的智慧来解决现实世界中的背包问题。该网络系统的核心模块是一套算法和一个新颖的交互界面。该接口以递增的方式呈现比较任务,并通过奖励机制激励人群参与,该算法集仅在给定候选人之间的成对偏好的情况下解决背包问题。我们通过为招聘教授组建前面提到的“小组”来展示C-DMr的新颖性和实用性。具体而言,展示了四个功能:1)候选人入口,收集所有候选人的信息;2)陪审团审判,促进知情人群提供偏好;3)测量正在进行的“小队”的背包分析器;4)向教授推荐最后一组候选人的顾问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信