Performance comparison in Ultra Wide Band positioning in sensor networks: least square minimization versus grid search approach

L. Ferrigno, F. Milano, Valentina Pingerna, G. Cerro, M. Laracca
{"title":"Performance comparison in Ultra Wide Band positioning in sensor networks: least square minimization versus grid search approach","authors":"L. Ferrigno, F. Milano, Valentina Pingerna, G. Cerro, M. Laracca","doi":"10.1109/MN55117.2022.9887768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The localization task in sensor networks is partic-ularly critical whenever the sensor measurements are position-related, as in case of thermal and electromagnetic quantities. The deployment of a sensor network often requires the usage of low-cost devices able to achieve acceptable measurement accuracy and having the need to retrieve fast and accurate positioning information. In such networks, the localization task is generally performed by a special node coordinating the network. Nevertheless, its computing power is often limited. To this aim, in this paper we compare two different positioning techniques (least square minimization, grid search), to be applied in Ultra- Wide-Band positioning scheme, from the accuracy point of view and computing time required for accomplishing the task. They differ in working principle, needed a priori information, localization resolution and time to completion parameter. According to the available resources, the adoption of one of them should be prefer-able to the other one. Obtained results prove the goodness of both methods, specifically ranking them by application purposes. The paper is intended to give the designers an extensive analysis to evaluate pros and cons to adopt a completely blind positioning technique, namely the least square minimization, versus a more informed and constrained system, as the grid search case.","PeriodicalId":148281,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MN55117.2022.9887768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The localization task in sensor networks is partic-ularly critical whenever the sensor measurements are position-related, as in case of thermal and electromagnetic quantities. The deployment of a sensor network often requires the usage of low-cost devices able to achieve acceptable measurement accuracy and having the need to retrieve fast and accurate positioning information. In such networks, the localization task is generally performed by a special node coordinating the network. Nevertheless, its computing power is often limited. To this aim, in this paper we compare two different positioning techniques (least square minimization, grid search), to be applied in Ultra- Wide-Band positioning scheme, from the accuracy point of view and computing time required for accomplishing the task. They differ in working principle, needed a priori information, localization resolution and time to completion parameter. According to the available resources, the adoption of one of them should be prefer-able to the other one. Obtained results prove the goodness of both methods, specifically ranking them by application purposes. The paper is intended to give the designers an extensive analysis to evaluate pros and cons to adopt a completely blind positioning technique, namely the least square minimization, versus a more informed and constrained system, as the grid search case.
传感器网络中超宽带定位性能比较:最小二乘最小化与网格搜索方法
当传感器测量与位置相关时,例如在热和电磁量的情况下,传感器网络中的定位任务尤为关键。传感器网络的部署通常需要使用能够达到可接受的测量精度的低成本设备,并且需要检索快速准确的定位信息。在这种网络中,定位任务通常由一个特殊的节点来协调网络。然而,它的计算能力通常是有限的。为此,本文从精度和完成任务所需的计算时间两方面比较了两种不同的定位技术(最小二乘最小化和网格搜索)在超宽带定位方案中的应用。它们的工作原理不同,需要先验信息、定位分辨率和完井时间参数。根据现有资源,采用其中一种应优于另一种。所得结果证明了这两种方法的优点,并根据应用目的对它们进行了排序。本文旨在为设计师提供广泛的分析,以评估采用完全盲定位技术(即最小二乘最小化)与更知情和约束的系统(如网格搜索案例)的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信