Storytelling beyond the Academy Exploring Roles, Responsibilities and Regulations in the Open Access Dissemination of Research Outputs and Visual Data

Dawn Mannay
{"title":"Storytelling beyond the Academy Exploring Roles, Responsibilities and Regulations in the Open Access Dissemination of Research Outputs and Visual Data","authors":"Dawn Mannay","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade there has been a movement towards facilitating Open Access to academic outputs via the World Wide Web. This movement has been characterised as one that embodies corporate citizenship because such sharing has the potential to benefit all stakeholders; academics, policy makers, charitable sectors and the wider public. In the UK, the Economic and Social Research Council are implementing Open Access compliance guidelines for research that they fund; which is interpreted by individual institutions in their school regulations. In the case of doctoral theses, there is now a requirement for students to provide an electronic format of their final work to be included in their schools online digital repository. In a number of UK institutions, University Awards and Progress Committees will only consider awarding the doctoral degree once these requirements have been satisfied. Although this move to Open Access can be considered as an egalitarian endeavour; this paper argues that an important stakeholder may have been over looked in the march towards progressive dissemination. The temporal space between gaining informed consent from research participants; and the changing nature of the accessibility of outputs can both engender a breach of ethics in terms of the initial agreements negotiated with participants and raise issues around representation in the ongoing dissemination and reformulation of the original work; particularly where visual images are central to research outputs. The paper utilises autoethnography and poetry to reflect on my own encounter with the requirement for Open Access and the ways in which this brings up concerns around ethics, obligations and integrity.","PeriodicalId":429926,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In the last decade there has been a movement towards facilitating Open Access to academic outputs via the World Wide Web. This movement has been characterised as one that embodies corporate citizenship because such sharing has the potential to benefit all stakeholders; academics, policy makers, charitable sectors and the wider public. In the UK, the Economic and Social Research Council are implementing Open Access compliance guidelines for research that they fund; which is interpreted by individual institutions in their school regulations. In the case of doctoral theses, there is now a requirement for students to provide an electronic format of their final work to be included in their schools online digital repository. In a number of UK institutions, University Awards and Progress Committees will only consider awarding the doctoral degree once these requirements have been satisfied. Although this move to Open Access can be considered as an egalitarian endeavour; this paper argues that an important stakeholder may have been over looked in the march towards progressive dissemination. The temporal space between gaining informed consent from research participants; and the changing nature of the accessibility of outputs can both engender a breach of ethics in terms of the initial agreements negotiated with participants and raise issues around representation in the ongoing dissemination and reformulation of the original work; particularly where visual images are central to research outputs. The paper utilises autoethnography and poetry to reflect on my own encounter with the requirement for Open Access and the ways in which this brings up concerns around ethics, obligations and integrity.
超越学院的叙事:探索研究成果和视觉数据开放获取传播中的角色、责任和规则
在过去的十年里,已经出现了一种通过万维网促进开放获取学术成果的运动。这一运动被定性为体现了企业公民意识,因为这种分享有可能使所有利益相关者受益;学术界、政策制定者、慈善机构和广大公众。在英国,经济和社会研究委员会(Economic and Social Research Council)正在为其资助的研究实施开放获取合规准则;这是由各个机构在他们的学校章程中解释的。在博士论文的情况下,现在要求学生提供他们的最终工作的电子格式,以包括在他们学校的在线数字存储库中。在许多英国机构中,大学奖励和进步委员会只有在满足这些要求后才会考虑授予博士学位。虽然这种向开放获取的转变可以被视为一种平等主义的努力;本文认为,一个重要的利益相关者可能被忽视了在前进的传播。获得研究参与者知情同意之间的时间间隔;产出可及性的变化既会违反与参与者谈判达成的最初协议的道德规范,也会在正在进行的传播和重新编写原始作品时引发有关代表性的问题;特别是在视觉图像是研究成果的核心的地方。这篇论文利用自我民族志和诗歌来反思我自己对开放获取要求的遭遇,以及这带来的对道德、义务和诚信的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信