Introduction to the Handbook on Global Value Chains

S. Ponte, G. Gereffi, Gale Raj‐Reichert
{"title":"Introduction to the Handbook on Global Value Chains","authors":"S. Ponte, G. Gereffi, Gale Raj‐Reichert","doi":"10.4337/9781788113779.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological and organizational changes have been crucial in transforming the way in which production is organized across time and space. The steam engine in the nineteenth century made transportation and manufacturing economical in ways that allowed the spatial separation of production from consumption (Baldwin, 2016). Although for much of the twentieth century production remained organized along vertically integrated firms, by the late 1970s a more flexible and spatially dispersed mode of production had taken hold based on slicing production into specific tasks and moving some of these out of the boundary of the firm through external contracting (Piore and Sabel, 1984). Information and communication technology (ICT) in the latter part of the twentieth century further facilitated the global outsourcing and offshoring of manufacturing activities (Dicken, 2007). This has led to the organization of economic activity in global value chains (GVCs) that are dispersed globally but governed centrally by ‘lead firms’ (Gereffi, 1994b; Gereffi, Humphrey and Sturgeon, 2005; Gibbon and Ponte, 2005; Bair, 2009a; Cattaneo, Gereffi and Staritz, 2010; Ponte and Sturgeon, 2014). The term ‘global value chain’ refers to the full range of activities that firms, farmers and workers carry out to bring a product or service from its conception to its end use, recycling or reuse. These activities include design, production, processing, assembly, distribution, maintenance and repair, disposal/recycling, marketing, finance and consumer services. In a ‘global’ value chain, these functions are distributed among many firms scattered around the world. In this context, ‘lead firms’ are groups of firms that operate at particular functional positions along the chain. Lead firms are able to shape what is done and by whom along the chain, at what price, using what standards, to which specifications and at what point in time they are delivered (Humphrey and Schmitz, 2001; Gereffi et al., 2005; Ponte and Sturgeon, 2014). GVC governance, therefore, is the set of concrete practices and organizational forms through which a specific division of labour between lead firms and other actors arise and is managed (Gibbon, Bair and Ponte, 2008). Understanding the changing dynamics of the global economy requires knowledge of how GVCs are governed and what distributional effects arise from different governance forms. The concept of GVC governance is based on the observation that value chains are rarely coordinated spontaneously through market exchange (Gereffi, 1994b; Gereffi et al., 2005; Gibbon et al., 2008). Instead, they are governed as a result of strategies and decision making by specific actors, usually large firms that manage access to final markets globally, but also at regional and national and local levels. In deciding how to manage trade and production networks in global industries, lead firms are faced with a number of choices. First, whether to make parts and components or provide particular services inhouse, procure them on the market, or adopt hybrid solutions involving various kinds of longer-term outsourcing relationships with suppliers. Second, if they decide to outsource","PeriodicalId":250962,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Global Value Chains","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Global Value Chains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113779.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Technological and organizational changes have been crucial in transforming the way in which production is organized across time and space. The steam engine in the nineteenth century made transportation and manufacturing economical in ways that allowed the spatial separation of production from consumption (Baldwin, 2016). Although for much of the twentieth century production remained organized along vertically integrated firms, by the late 1970s a more flexible and spatially dispersed mode of production had taken hold based on slicing production into specific tasks and moving some of these out of the boundary of the firm through external contracting (Piore and Sabel, 1984). Information and communication technology (ICT) in the latter part of the twentieth century further facilitated the global outsourcing and offshoring of manufacturing activities (Dicken, 2007). This has led to the organization of economic activity in global value chains (GVCs) that are dispersed globally but governed centrally by ‘lead firms’ (Gereffi, 1994b; Gereffi, Humphrey and Sturgeon, 2005; Gibbon and Ponte, 2005; Bair, 2009a; Cattaneo, Gereffi and Staritz, 2010; Ponte and Sturgeon, 2014). The term ‘global value chain’ refers to the full range of activities that firms, farmers and workers carry out to bring a product or service from its conception to its end use, recycling or reuse. These activities include design, production, processing, assembly, distribution, maintenance and repair, disposal/recycling, marketing, finance and consumer services. In a ‘global’ value chain, these functions are distributed among many firms scattered around the world. In this context, ‘lead firms’ are groups of firms that operate at particular functional positions along the chain. Lead firms are able to shape what is done and by whom along the chain, at what price, using what standards, to which specifications and at what point in time they are delivered (Humphrey and Schmitz, 2001; Gereffi et al., 2005; Ponte and Sturgeon, 2014). GVC governance, therefore, is the set of concrete practices and organizational forms through which a specific division of labour between lead firms and other actors arise and is managed (Gibbon, Bair and Ponte, 2008). Understanding the changing dynamics of the global economy requires knowledge of how GVCs are governed and what distributional effects arise from different governance forms. The concept of GVC governance is based on the observation that value chains are rarely coordinated spontaneously through market exchange (Gereffi, 1994b; Gereffi et al., 2005; Gibbon et al., 2008). Instead, they are governed as a result of strategies and decision making by specific actors, usually large firms that manage access to final markets globally, but also at regional and national and local levels. In deciding how to manage trade and production networks in global industries, lead firms are faced with a number of choices. First, whether to make parts and components or provide particular services inhouse, procure them on the market, or adopt hybrid solutions involving various kinds of longer-term outsourcing relationships with suppliers. Second, if they decide to outsource
《全球价值链手册》简介
技术和组织变革对于改变跨时间和空间组织生产的方式至关重要。19世纪的蒸汽机使运输和制造业变得经济,使生产和消费在空间上分离(Baldwin, 2016)。尽管在20世纪的大部分时间里,生产仍然是由垂直整合的公司组织起来的,但到20世纪70年代末,一种更加灵活和空间分散的生产模式已经形成,这种模式将生产分成特定的任务,并通过外部合同将其中一些任务移出公司的边界(Piore和Sabel, 1984)。信息和通信技术(ICT)在20世纪后半叶进一步促进了全球外包和离岸制造活动(Dicken, 2007)。这导致了全球价值链(GVCs)中经济活动的组织,这些价值链分散在全球,但由“领导公司”集中管理(Gereffi, 1994b;Gereffi, Humphrey and Sturgeon, 2005;Gibbon and Ponte, 2005;贝尔,2009;Cattaneo, Gereffi and Staritz, 2010;庞特和斯特金,2014)。“全球价值链”一词指的是企业、农民和工人将产品或服务从概念到最终使用、回收或再利用所进行的一系列活动。这些活动包括设计、生产、加工、装配、分销、维护和修理、处置/回收、营销、财务和消费者服务。在“全球”价值链中,这些功能分布在世界各地的许多公司中。在这种情况下,“领先企业”是指在供应链上的特定职能位置上运营的企业集团。领先企业能够决定在供应链上由谁、以什么价格、使用什么标准、按照什么规格以及在什么时间点交付(Humphrey and Schmitz, 2001;Gereffi et al., 2005;庞特和斯特金,2014)。因此,全球价值链治理是一套具体的实践和组织形式,通过这些实践和组织形式,领导企业和其他参与者之间产生并管理特定的劳动分工(Gibbon, Bair和Ponte, 2008)。要理解全球经济不断变化的动态,需要了解全球价值链是如何治理的,以及不同治理形式产生的分配效应。全球价值链治理的概念是基于这样的观察,即价值链很少通过市场交换自发协调(Gereffi, 1994b;Gereffi et al., 2005;Gibbon et al., 2008)。相反,它们是由特定行为者的战略和决策所管理的,这些行为者通常是管理进入全球最终市场的大公司,但也在区域、国家和地方各级。在决定如何管理全球工业中的贸易和生产网络时,领先企业面临着许多选择。首先,是在内部制造零部件或提供特定服务,还是在市场上采购,还是采用涉及与供应商建立各种长期外包关系的混合解决方案。第二,如果他们决定外包
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信