Pensions and ESG: An Institutional and Historical Perspective

P. Hammond, Amy O'Brien
{"title":"Pensions and ESG: An Institutional and Historical Perspective","authors":"P. Hammond, Amy O'Brien","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3936028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable investing is growing into its moment. Funded pensions, which were among the first institutions to respond to sustainability concerns, are showing renewed interest in better ways to reflect responsible investing objectives, along with regulators, asset managers and shareholder groups. Looking back, the principal elements of sustainability—environmental, social and governance (ESG)—all have different origins and took different pathways. Looking across, sustainable investing developed differently depending on region and country. Viewing it today, we see the trend toward E, S, & G convergence—of definition, process and organization—toward a more integrated investment perspective and process. With growing asset size, funded pensions, sovereign wealth funds and other large institutional investors became ‘universal owners’ and, along with thought leaders and regulators, drove the evolution of sustainable investing toward the more systematic set of tools and policies we see today. Looking forward, questions remain, such as who will be most influential in determining the future of sustainable investing—pensions and other institutional investors, governments, shareholders and companies-- as well as what it will look like. As such, sustainability remains a work in progress and pensions are in a strong position to shape its evolution.","PeriodicalId":407792,"journal":{"name":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3936028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sustainable investing is growing into its moment. Funded pensions, which were among the first institutions to respond to sustainability concerns, are showing renewed interest in better ways to reflect responsible investing objectives, along with regulators, asset managers and shareholder groups. Looking back, the principal elements of sustainability—environmental, social and governance (ESG)—all have different origins and took different pathways. Looking across, sustainable investing developed differently depending on region and country. Viewing it today, we see the trend toward E, S, & G convergence—of definition, process and organization—toward a more integrated investment perspective and process. With growing asset size, funded pensions, sovereign wealth funds and other large institutional investors became ‘universal owners’ and, along with thought leaders and regulators, drove the evolution of sustainable investing toward the more systematic set of tools and policies we see today. Looking forward, questions remain, such as who will be most influential in determining the future of sustainable investing—pensions and other institutional investors, governments, shareholders and companies-- as well as what it will look like. As such, sustainability remains a work in progress and pensions are in a strong position to shape its evolution.
养老金和ESG:制度和历史的视角
可持续投资的时机正在成熟。基金型养老金是首批对可持续性担忧做出回应的机构之一。如今,与监管机构、资产管理公司和股东团体一样,基金型养老金对更好地反映负责任投资目标的方式重新表现出兴趣。回顾过去,可持续发展的主要要素——环境、社会和治理(ESG)——都有不同的起源和不同的途径。放眼全球,可持续投资的发展因地区和国家而异。今天,我们看到了E、S和G融合的趋势——定义、过程和组织——朝着更加集成的投资视角和过程发展。随着资产规模的不断扩大,基金养老基金、主权财富基金和其他大型机构投资者成为了“普遍所有者”,并与思想领袖和监管机构一道,推动了可持续投资向我们今天看到的一套更系统化的工具和政策发展。展望未来,问题依然存在,比如谁将在决定可持续投资的未来方面最有影响力——养老金和其他机构投资者、政府、股东和公司——以及未来会是什么样子。因此,可持续性仍然是一项正在进行的工作,养老金在塑造其演变方面处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信