The Theory of Alienation: Marx’s Debt to Hegel

Raya Dunayevskaya
{"title":"The Theory of Alienation: Marx’s Debt to Hegel","authors":"Raya Dunayevskaya","doi":"10.1163/9789004383678_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic “Marx’s Debt to Hegel,” is neither merely academic, nor does it pertain only to the historical period of Marx’s lifetime. From the Hungarian revolt to the African revolutions, from the student demonstrators in Japan to the Negro revolution in the U.S., the struggle for freedom has transformed reality and pulled Hegelian dialectics out of the academic halls and philosophy books onto the living stage of history. It is true that this transformation of Hegel into a contemporary has been via Marx. It is no accident, however, that Russian Communism’s attack on Marx has been via Hegel. Because they recognize in the so-called mystical Absolute “the negation of the negation,” the revolution against themselves, Hegel remains so alive and worrisome to the Russian rulers today. Ever since Andrei Zhdanov in 1947 demanded that the Russian philosophers find nothing short of “a new dialectical law,” or, rather, declared “criticism and self-criticism” to be that alleged new dialectical law to replace the Hegelian and objective law of development through contradiction,1 up to the 21st Congress of the Russian Communist Party where the special philosophic sessions declared Nikita Khrushchev to be “the true humanist,” the attack on both the young Marx and the mystic Hegel has been continuous. It reached a climax in the 1955 attacks on Marx’s Early Essays2 in theory. In actuality it came to life as the Sino-Soviet Pact3 to put down the Hungarian Revolution. One thing these intellectual bureaucrats sense correctly: Hegel’s Concept of the Absolute and the international struggle for freedom are not as far apart as would appear on the surface.","PeriodicalId":121122,"journal":{"name":"Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution in Permanence for Our Day","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution in Permanence for Our Day","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004383678_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The topic “Marx’s Debt to Hegel,” is neither merely academic, nor does it pertain only to the historical period of Marx’s lifetime. From the Hungarian revolt to the African revolutions, from the student demonstrators in Japan to the Negro revolution in the U.S., the struggle for freedom has transformed reality and pulled Hegelian dialectics out of the academic halls and philosophy books onto the living stage of history. It is true that this transformation of Hegel into a contemporary has been via Marx. It is no accident, however, that Russian Communism’s attack on Marx has been via Hegel. Because they recognize in the so-called mystical Absolute “the negation of the negation,” the revolution against themselves, Hegel remains so alive and worrisome to the Russian rulers today. Ever since Andrei Zhdanov in 1947 demanded that the Russian philosophers find nothing short of “a new dialectical law,” or, rather, declared “criticism and self-criticism” to be that alleged new dialectical law to replace the Hegelian and objective law of development through contradiction,1 up to the 21st Congress of the Russian Communist Party where the special philosophic sessions declared Nikita Khrushchev to be “the true humanist,” the attack on both the young Marx and the mystic Hegel has been continuous. It reached a climax in the 1955 attacks on Marx’s Early Essays2 in theory. In actuality it came to life as the Sino-Soviet Pact3 to put down the Hungarian Revolution. One thing these intellectual bureaucrats sense correctly: Hegel’s Concept of the Absolute and the international struggle for freedom are not as far apart as would appear on the surface.
异化论:马克思欠黑格尔的债
“马克思欠黑格尔的债”这个话题不仅是学术问题,也不仅仅是马克思一生的历史时期的问题。从匈牙利起义到非洲革命,从日本学生示威到美国黑人革命,争取自由的斗争改变了现实,把黑格尔辩证法从学术殿堂和哲学书籍中拉到了历史的舞台上。诚然,黑格尔向同时代人的转变是通过马克思实现的。然而,俄国共产主义通过黑格尔对马克思的攻击并非偶然。因为他们在所谓的神秘绝对主义中认识到“否定的否定”,即反对他们自己的革命,黑格尔仍然如此鲜活,对今天的俄国统治者来说令人担忧。自从安德烈·日达诺夫在1947年要求俄国哲学家找到“新的辩证规律”,或者更确切地说,宣布“批判和自我批评”是所谓的新的辩证规律,以取代黑格尔的、通过矛盾发展的客观规律,直到俄罗斯共产党第21次代表大会的特别哲学会议宣布尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫是“真正的人文主义者”,对年轻的马克思和神秘主义者黑格尔的攻击一直在持续。它在1955年对马克思《早期随笔》的理论攻击中达到了高潮。实际上,它是以镇压匈牙利革命的《中苏条约》的形式出现的。这些知识官僚正确地意识到一件事:黑格尔的绝对概念和国际上争取自由的斗争并不像表面上看起来那么遥远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信