Policy Brief 7: Reducing the social acceptability of wildlife trafficking through behaviour change interventions

Saba Kassa, Jacopo Costa, Robert Lugolobi, Claudia Baez Camargo
{"title":"Policy Brief 7: Reducing the social acceptability of wildlife trafficking through behaviour change interventions","authors":"Saba Kassa, Jacopo Costa, Robert Lugolobi, Claudia Baez Camargo","doi":"10.12685/bigpb.7.1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behaviour change interventions aimed at reducing the social acceptability of wildlife trafficking are an important part of efforts to prevent wildlife crime. This policy brief summarises lessons learned about how to develop and frame effective messages in the context of these interventions, based on field work conducted in Uganda.  \nA key first step is to narrowly identify the right target audience. While a general public awareness campaign may have its merits, it may be more effective to focus on those identified as most vulnerable to participating in wildlife trafficking, namely young men, those that live around wildlife trafficking hotspots and those involved in trade. \nSecond, it appears most promising to formulate messages that challenge narrow utilitarian perceptions of wildlife by highlighting the hidden costs of trafficking and its negative impact on the economy and the environment. Messages that focus on legal risks should showcase successes in detection and sanctions, especially in a context in which impunity is perceived to be high. Other messages that seek to challenge the overvalued benefits of engaging in wildlife trafficking in relation to wealth and social status should be carefully nuanced to avoid rejection. \nThird, how we frame such messages is equally important. The research suggests that appealing to social identity and highlighting personal consequences are the most promising frames to adopt. \nOverall, practitioners are advised to develop and test messages and approaches that are personal and precise. \nThis report was funded by PMI IMPACT, a grant award initiative of Philip Morris International (PMI). In the performance of their research, the authors maintained full independence from PMI. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of PMI. Neither PMI, nor any of its affiliates, nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained herein.","PeriodicalId":217465,"journal":{"name":"Basel Institute on Governance Policy Briefs","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basel Institute on Governance Policy Briefs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12685/bigpb.7.1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behaviour change interventions aimed at reducing the social acceptability of wildlife trafficking are an important part of efforts to prevent wildlife crime. This policy brief summarises lessons learned about how to develop and frame effective messages in the context of these interventions, based on field work conducted in Uganda.  A key first step is to narrowly identify the right target audience. While a general public awareness campaign may have its merits, it may be more effective to focus on those identified as most vulnerable to participating in wildlife trafficking, namely young men, those that live around wildlife trafficking hotspots and those involved in trade. Second, it appears most promising to formulate messages that challenge narrow utilitarian perceptions of wildlife by highlighting the hidden costs of trafficking and its negative impact on the economy and the environment. Messages that focus on legal risks should showcase successes in detection and sanctions, especially in a context in which impunity is perceived to be high. Other messages that seek to challenge the overvalued benefits of engaging in wildlife trafficking in relation to wealth and social status should be carefully nuanced to avoid rejection. Third, how we frame such messages is equally important. The research suggests that appealing to social identity and highlighting personal consequences are the most promising frames to adopt. Overall, practitioners are advised to develop and test messages and approaches that are personal and precise. This report was funded by PMI IMPACT, a grant award initiative of Philip Morris International (PMI). In the performance of their research, the authors maintained full independence from PMI. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of PMI. Neither PMI, nor any of its affiliates, nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained herein.
政策简报7:通过行为改变干预措施降低野生动物贩运的社会可接受性
旨在降低社会对野生动物贩运的接受程度的行为改变干预措施是预防野生动物犯罪工作的重要组成部分。本政策简报总结了在这些干预措施的背景下如何根据在乌干达进行的实地工作制定和构建有效信息的经验教训。关键的第一步是确定正确的目标受众。虽然一般的公众宣传运动可能有其优点,但将重点放在那些被确定为最容易参与野生动物贩运的人身上可能更有效,即年轻人、生活在野生动物贩运热点附近的人以及参与贸易的人。其次,通过强调走私的隐性成本及其对经济和环境的负面影响,来挑战对野生动物狭隘的功利主义看法似乎是最有希望的。以法律风险为重点的信息应展示在侦查和制裁方面取得的成功,特别是在有罪不罚现象普遍存在的情况下。其他试图挑战从事野生动物贩运在财富和社会地位方面被高估的利益的信息,应小心谨慎,以免遭到拒绝。第三,我们如何构建这些信息也同样重要。研究表明,吸引社会认同和强调个人后果是最有希望采用的框架。总的来说,建议从业者开发和测试个性化和精确的信息和方法。本报告由PMI IMPACT资助,PMI IMPACT是菲利普莫里斯国际公司(PMI)的一项奖励倡议。在研究过程中,作者完全独立于PMI。本文仅代表作者的观点和意见,并不代表PMI的观点。PMI、其任何关联公司或代表其行事的任何人均不对使用本信息承担任何责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信