PROSPECTS OF DETERMINING THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT JURISDICTION REGARDING ECOCIDE

O. Shumilo
{"title":"PROSPECTS OF DETERMINING THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT JURISDICTION REGARDING ECOCIDE","authors":"O. Shumilo","doi":"10.15421/392207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the possibilities and the need to determine the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court on ecocide. The paper considers the essence and core features of ecocide as a crime against humanity under international criminal and environmental law. The author has examined the legislation of the countries that either distinguish this crime or include it in the structure of other crimes. The paper also highlights the conventions prohibiting the use of methods or means of warfare that intend to cause or actually cause severe long-term damage to the environment. The definition of the ecocide, which is no longer connected only to armed hostilities, has been provided according to the findings from a group of international experts. The constituent elements of this definition have been analyzed, namely: needless, severe, widespread, long-term and environment. Emphasis has been placed on the fact that there is a problem with the existing definition of ecocide in the Rome Statute, which links this crime exclusively to the conduct of hostilities. At this point, it would be more reasonable to connect it to the activities of the state, which is not necessarily aimed at achieving military superiority. Therefore, the next step would be to develop a rule on international criminal liability for environmental damage, regardless of the fact of hostilities. It has been stressed that according to national practice, in recent years, law enforcement agencies have initiated a remarkable number of criminal proceedings under Art. 441 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (ecocide), but failed to bring them to justice due to the shortcomings of the legislation. The blanket character of this norm presupposes the obligation to define the concept of 'environmental catastrophe'. The paper further elaborated on an example of a particular criminal proceeding under investigation of the Security Service of Ukraine. The suspicion was based on the reference to Art. 441 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and on the facts of air pollution and poisoning of air, water resources and soil, which could lead to an environmental catastrophe. It has been concluded that determining the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court on ecocide in peacetime will save the planet from destruction.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/392207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the possibilities and the need to determine the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court on ecocide. The paper considers the essence and core features of ecocide as a crime against humanity under international criminal and environmental law. The author has examined the legislation of the countries that either distinguish this crime or include it in the structure of other crimes. The paper also highlights the conventions prohibiting the use of methods or means of warfare that intend to cause or actually cause severe long-term damage to the environment. The definition of the ecocide, which is no longer connected only to armed hostilities, has been provided according to the findings from a group of international experts. The constituent elements of this definition have been analyzed, namely: needless, severe, widespread, long-term and environment. Emphasis has been placed on the fact that there is a problem with the existing definition of ecocide in the Rome Statute, which links this crime exclusively to the conduct of hostilities. At this point, it would be more reasonable to connect it to the activities of the state, which is not necessarily aimed at achieving military superiority. Therefore, the next step would be to develop a rule on international criminal liability for environmental damage, regardless of the fact of hostilities. It has been stressed that according to national practice, in recent years, law enforcement agencies have initiated a remarkable number of criminal proceedings under Art. 441 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (ecocide), but failed to bring them to justice due to the shortcomings of the legislation. The blanket character of this norm presupposes the obligation to define the concept of 'environmental catastrophe'. The paper further elaborated on an example of a particular criminal proceeding under investigation of the Security Service of Ukraine. The suspicion was based on the reference to Art. 441 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and on the facts of air pollution and poisoning of air, water resources and soil, which could lead to an environmental catastrophe. It has been concluded that determining the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court on ecocide in peacetime will save the planet from destruction.
确定国际刑事法院关于生态灭绝管辖权的前景
文章分析了确定国际刑事法院生态灭绝管辖权的可能性和必要性。本文从国际刑法和环境法的角度分析了生态灭绝罪作为危害人类罪的本质和核心特征。笔者考察了区分这一犯罪或将其纳入其他犯罪结构的国家的立法。该文件还强调了禁止使用意图对环境造成或实际上对环境造成严重长期损害的作战方法或手段的公约。根据一组国际专家的调查结果,生态灭绝的定义不再仅仅与武装敌对行动有关。分析了这一定义的构成要素,即:不必要、严重、广泛、长期和环境。有人强调,《罗马规约》中关于生态灭绝的现有定义存在问题,该定义将这一罪行完全与敌对行动联系起来。在这一点上,将其与国家活动联系起来更为合理,这些活动不一定旨在获得军事优势。因此,下一步将是制定一项关于环境损害的国际刑事责任的规则,不论敌对行动的事实如何。有人强调,根据国家惯例,近年来,执法机构根据《乌克兰刑法》第441条(生态灭绝)提起了大量刑事诉讼,但由于立法的缺陷,未能将其绳之以法。这一规范的包罗万象的特点预设了定义“环境灾难”概念的义务。该文件进一步阐述了乌克兰安全局正在调查的一个具体刑事诉讼的例子。这一怀疑是根据《乌克兰刑法》第441条的规定,以及空气污染和空气、水资源和土壤中毒的事实,这可能导致环境灾难。人们得出结论,在和平时期确定国际刑事法院对生态灭绝的管辖权将拯救地球免遭破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信