Acquisition of Information in Loan Markets and Bank Market Power - an Empirical Investigation

Karl-Hermann Fischer
{"title":"Acquisition of Information in Loan Markets and Bank Market Power - an Empirical Investigation","authors":"Karl-Hermann Fischer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.240921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do commercial banks invest less in information gathering activity when they compete more aggressively with each other? Does intensifying competitive pressure in bank loan markets affect the quality of informational ties that bind borrowers and lending banks? This paper contributes to this discussion by providing an empirical analysis of banks' information acquisition within a loan application situation. Using survey data from German manufacturing firms, we are able to measure information flows from loan applicants to banks. We find that firms located in more concentrated banking markets have to transfer more project-specific information to their lending banks. Furthermore we find that banks that systematically acquire more information about their loan customers are able to provide liquidity without inducing additional costly transfer of information. Third, we find credit to be more readily available in more concentrated banking markets. This confirms recent US findings. However, our analysis of banks' information acquisition offers an alternative explanation of why credit availability systematically varies with bank market structure.","PeriodicalId":192327,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2000 London Meetings (Archive)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2000 London Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.240921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Do commercial banks invest less in information gathering activity when they compete more aggressively with each other? Does intensifying competitive pressure in bank loan markets affect the quality of informational ties that bind borrowers and lending banks? This paper contributes to this discussion by providing an empirical analysis of banks' information acquisition within a loan application situation. Using survey data from German manufacturing firms, we are able to measure information flows from loan applicants to banks. We find that firms located in more concentrated banking markets have to transfer more project-specific information to their lending banks. Furthermore we find that banks that systematically acquire more information about their loan customers are able to provide liquidity without inducing additional costly transfer of information. Third, we find credit to be more readily available in more concentrated banking markets. This confirms recent US findings. However, our analysis of banks' information acquisition offers an alternative explanation of why credit availability systematically varies with bank market structure.
贷款市场信息获取与银行市场支配力的实证研究
当商业银行之间的竞争更加激烈时,它们在信息收集活动上的投入会减少吗?银行贷款市场日益加剧的竞争压力是否会影响将借款人与贷款银行联系在一起的信息纽带的质量?本文通过对银行在贷款申请情况下的信息获取进行实证分析,有助于这一讨论。利用德国制造企业的调查数据,我们能够衡量从贷款申请人到银行的信息流。我们发现,位于更集中的银行市场的公司必须向其贷款银行转移更多特定项目的信息。此外,我们发现,系统地获取有关其贷款客户的更多信息的银行能够在不诱导额外的昂贵信息转移的情况下提供流动性。第三,我们发现,在集中度更高的银行市场,信贷更容易获得。这证实了美国最近的研究结果。然而,我们对银行信息获取的分析提供了另一种解释,为什么信贷可得性随着银行市场结构而系统性地变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信