Care pathways: some social scientific observations on the field

D. Allen
{"title":"Care pathways: some social scientific observations on the field","authors":"D. Allen","doi":"10.1258/jicp.2009.009016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an earlier companion paper published in the journal, I drew on an ethnographic analysis of the care pathway field to argue that the growing popularity of pathway methodology can be explained, in part, by its effectiveness in aligning clinical and management interests in offering a single solution to shared health service problems. This breadth of appeal disguises tensions between clinical and management agenda which creates challenges in inscribing this multiplicity of interests into the pathway design and implementing the methodology in practice. This helps to explain the challenges of pathway development and implementation and the range of interventions to which the term ‘pathway’ is applied. In this paper I consider how pathway leaders have responded to these concerns and offer an alternative response, informed by social science.","PeriodicalId":114083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Pathways","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/jicp.2009.009016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In an earlier companion paper published in the journal, I drew on an ethnographic analysis of the care pathway field to argue that the growing popularity of pathway methodology can be explained, in part, by its effectiveness in aligning clinical and management interests in offering a single solution to shared health service problems. This breadth of appeal disguises tensions between clinical and management agenda which creates challenges in inscribing this multiplicity of interests into the pathway design and implementing the methodology in practice. This helps to explain the challenges of pathway development and implementation and the range of interventions to which the term ‘pathway’ is applied. In this paper I consider how pathway leaders have responded to these concerns and offer an alternative response, informed by social science.
护理途径:一些社会科学领域的观察
在该杂志上发表的一篇较早的论文中,我利用了对护理路径领域的人种学分析,认为路径方法论的日益普及可以部分地解释为它在为共享医疗服务问题提供单一解决方案时有效地协调了临床和管理利益。这种吸引力的广度掩盖了临床和管理议程之间的紧张关系,这在将这种利益的多样性纳入途径设计和实践中实施方法方面带来了挑战。这有助于解释途径发展和实施的挑战以及“途径”一词所适用的干预措施的范围。在本文中,我考虑了路径领导者如何回应这些担忧,并根据社会科学提供了另一种回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信