ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Binarization Competition

R. Lins, E. Kavallieratou, E. B. Smith, R. Bernardino, D. Jesus
{"title":"ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Binarization Competition","authors":"R. Lins, E. Kavallieratou, E. B. Smith, R. Bernardino, D. Jesus","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Binarization Competition assessed the performance of seventeen new together with thirty previously published binarization algorithms. The quality of the resulting two-tone image and the execution time were assessed. Comparisons were on both in \"real-world\" and synthetic scanned images, and in documents photographed with four models of widely used portable phones. Most of the submitted algorithms employed machine learning techniques and performed best on the most complex images. Traditional algorithms provided very good results at a fraction of the time.","PeriodicalId":325437,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2019.00248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Binarization Competition assessed the performance of seventeen new together with thirty previously published binarization algorithms. The quality of the resulting two-tone image and the execution time were assessed. Comparisons were on both in "real-world" and synthetic scanned images, and in documents photographed with four models of widely used portable phones. Most of the submitted algorithms employed machine learning techniques and performed best on the most complex images. Traditional algorithms provided very good results at a fraction of the time.
ICDAR 2019时间质量二值化竞赛
ICDAR 2019时间质量二值化竞赛评估了17种新二值化算法和30种先前发布的二值化算法的性能。评估了得到的双色图像的质量和执行时间。研究人员对“真实世界”和合成扫描图像进行了比较,并对使用四种型号的广泛使用的便携式手机拍摄的文件进行了比较。大多数提交的算法都采用了机器学习技术,在最复杂的图像上表现最好。传统算法在很短的时间内提供了很好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信