Capacity analysis for parallel and sequential MIMO equalizers

Xinying Zhang, S. Kung
{"title":"Capacity analysis for parallel and sequential MIMO equalizers","authors":"Xinying Zhang, S. Kung","doi":"10.1109/ICME.2003.1221689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that linear MMSE can outperform its zero-forcing counterpart. In combination with a successive interference canceller, MMSE can fully exploit the capacity of MIMO (multiple-input-multiple-output) channels [A.J. Viterbi, 1986, M.K. Varanasi, T. Guess, 1997]. In practice, however, such an advantage is compromised due to its implementation complexity and the requirement of accurate SNR estimate. Thus other equalizers such as zero-forcing may present an attractive alternative as long as the performance gap is tolerable. This motivates a need to quantify the tradeoff between MMSE and zero-forcing in both parallel and sequential structures. In this paper, the capacity performance of different equalization schemes is investigated, with closed-form formulas provided in terms of two key measures: capacity gaps and ratios. We also conclude that the capacity gain via structural choice (between parallel and sequential) far out-weights that via filter choice (between zero-forcing and MMSE). Indeed, the latter is found to be almost negligible for most practical SNR regions. It is also shown that the sequential zero-forcing equalizers can asymptotically reach the channel capacity when SNR approaches infinity, irrelevant of the detection order. Although this paper is focused on the flat-fading channels, the result is directly extendable to the ISI case by slicing the frequency band into infinitesimal stripes, each of which can be treated as flat.","PeriodicalId":118560,"journal":{"name":"2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2003.1221689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

It is well known that linear MMSE can outperform its zero-forcing counterpart. In combination with a successive interference canceller, MMSE can fully exploit the capacity of MIMO (multiple-input-multiple-output) channels [A.J. Viterbi, 1986, M.K. Varanasi, T. Guess, 1997]. In practice, however, such an advantage is compromised due to its implementation complexity and the requirement of accurate SNR estimate. Thus other equalizers such as zero-forcing may present an attractive alternative as long as the performance gap is tolerable. This motivates a need to quantify the tradeoff between MMSE and zero-forcing in both parallel and sequential structures. In this paper, the capacity performance of different equalization schemes is investigated, with closed-form formulas provided in terms of two key measures: capacity gaps and ratios. We also conclude that the capacity gain via structural choice (between parallel and sequential) far out-weights that via filter choice (between zero-forcing and MMSE). Indeed, the latter is found to be almost negligible for most practical SNR regions. It is also shown that the sequential zero-forcing equalizers can asymptotically reach the channel capacity when SNR approaches infinity, irrelevant of the detection order. Although this paper is focused on the flat-fading channels, the result is directly extendable to the ISI case by slicing the frequency band into infinitesimal stripes, each of which can be treated as flat.
并行和顺序MIMO均衡器的容量分析
众所周知,线性MMSE可以优于其零强迫对应。结合连续干扰消除器,MMSE可以充分利用MIMO(多输入-多输出)信道的容量[M.K. Varanasi, T. Guess]。然而,在实践中,由于其实现的复杂性和对准确信噪比估计的要求,这种优势受到了损害。因此,只要性能差距是可以容忍的,其他均衡器(如零强迫)可能是一个有吸引力的选择。这促使我们需要量化并行和顺序结构中MMSE和零强制之间的权衡。本文研究了不同均衡方案的容量性能,并给出了容量缺口和比率两个关键指标的封闭公式。我们还得出结论,通过结构选择(在并行和顺序之间)获得的容量增益远远超过通过过滤器选择(在零强迫和MMSE之间)获得的容量增益。事实上,对于大多数实际的信噪比区域,后者几乎可以忽略不计。当信噪比趋近于无穷大时,序列强制零均衡器可以渐近地达到信道容量,而与检测阶数无关。虽然本文关注的是平坦衰落信道,但通过将频带切成无限小的条纹,可以将结果直接扩展到ISI情况,每个条纹都可以视为平坦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信