Associations Among Patient Race, Sedation Practices, and Mortality in a Large Multi-Center Registry of COVID-19 Patients

T. Valley, T. Iwashyna, S. Cook, C. Hough, M. Armstrong-Hough
{"title":"Associations Among Patient Race, Sedation Practices, and Mortality in a Large Multi-Center Registry of COVID-19 Patients","authors":"T. Valley, T. Iwashyna, S. Cook, C. Hough, M. Armstrong-Hough","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Racial and ethnic minorities have accounted for the majority of intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalizations for COVID-19. At the same time, ICUs were forced to deviate from long-established care processes in response to a steep increase in admissions and to prevent healthcare worker infections. These shifts may have resulted in changes to sedation practices, such as level of sedation or sedation holidays, that differed by patient race or ethnicity. We aimed to examine associations among patient race and ethnicity, sedation practices, and mortality in a large, national sample of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed granular daily data from the Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry for COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs between February and November 2020. We included patients over 18 years of age, who were mechanically ventilated following clinical or PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. We will calculate descriptive statistics for mortality at discharge and 28 days by patient race/ethnicity, sex, and two care processes associated with mechanical ventilation: sedation level and sedation holidays. We will estimate risk-adjusted, hospital-level mortality differentials by race. We will use mixed effects logistic regression and causal mediation analysis to test associations among patient race/ethnicity, sedation practices for mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 28 days, controlling for comorbidities, markers of severity, and time to admission, and adjusting for clustering by ICU. Results: Among 19,626 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 8,668 (14.6%) received mechanical ventilation at 238 hospitals. The median age was 62 (IQR 40-72) and 45.1% were female. Among hospitalized patients, 23.3% self-identified as Hispanic, 26.6% as non-Hispanic Black, 35.6% as non-Hispanic White, and 14.5% as non-Hispanic and another racial group. Approximately 1% (n=236) of patients were missing race/ethnicity. At 28 days, 20.7% (n=4,076) of hospitalized patients were deceased. Use of benzodiazepines was highly clustered by hospital (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.63). In cluster-adjusted analyses, Hispanic patients were more likely to receive benzodiazepines at least once during hospitalization than either non-Hispanic White (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.76, p=0.013) or non-Hispanic Black (OR 0.70, p=0.003) patients. Multivariable mixed effects and causal mediation analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: Sedation practices, such as level of sedation and sedation holidays, are associated with mortality;yet these practices may differ based on a patient's race or ethnicity. We will leverage a unique, multi-center database with granular clinical information to understand how these differences may influence racial and ethnic disparities in respiratory failure.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Racial and ethnic minorities have accounted for the majority of intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalizations for COVID-19. At the same time, ICUs were forced to deviate from long-established care processes in response to a steep increase in admissions and to prevent healthcare worker infections. These shifts may have resulted in changes to sedation practices, such as level of sedation or sedation holidays, that differed by patient race or ethnicity. We aimed to examine associations among patient race and ethnicity, sedation practices, and mortality in a large, national sample of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed granular daily data from the Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry for COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs between February and November 2020. We included patients over 18 years of age, who were mechanically ventilated following clinical or PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. We will calculate descriptive statistics for mortality at discharge and 28 days by patient race/ethnicity, sex, and two care processes associated with mechanical ventilation: sedation level and sedation holidays. We will estimate risk-adjusted, hospital-level mortality differentials by race. We will use mixed effects logistic regression and causal mediation analysis to test associations among patient race/ethnicity, sedation practices for mechanical ventilation, and mortality at 28 days, controlling for comorbidities, markers of severity, and time to admission, and adjusting for clustering by ICU. Results: Among 19,626 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 8,668 (14.6%) received mechanical ventilation at 238 hospitals. The median age was 62 (IQR 40-72) and 45.1% were female. Among hospitalized patients, 23.3% self-identified as Hispanic, 26.6% as non-Hispanic Black, 35.6% as non-Hispanic White, and 14.5% as non-Hispanic and another racial group. Approximately 1% (n=236) of patients were missing race/ethnicity. At 28 days, 20.7% (n=4,076) of hospitalized patients were deceased. Use of benzodiazepines was highly clustered by hospital (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.63). In cluster-adjusted analyses, Hispanic patients were more likely to receive benzodiazepines at least once during hospitalization than either non-Hispanic White (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.76, p=0.013) or non-Hispanic Black (OR 0.70, p=0.003) patients. Multivariable mixed effects and causal mediation analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: Sedation practices, such as level of sedation and sedation holidays, are associated with mortality;yet these practices may differ based on a patient's race or ethnicity. We will leverage a unique, multi-center database with granular clinical information to understand how these differences may influence racial and ethnic disparities in respiratory failure.
在一项大型多中心COVID-19患者登记中,患者种族、镇静做法和死亡率之间的关联
在COVID-19重症监护病房(ICU)住院的患者中,种族和少数民族占大多数。与此同时,icu被迫偏离长期建立的护理流程,以应对入院人数的急剧增加,并防止医护人员感染。这些变化可能导致镇静实践的变化,如镇静水平或镇静假期,因患者种族或民族而异。我们的目的是在一个接受COVID-19机械通气的大型全国样本中研究患者种族和民族、镇静做法和死亡率之间的关系。方法:我们分析了2020年2月至11月期间入住icu的COVID-19患者的病毒感染和呼吸系统疾病通用研究(病毒)登记处的每日颗粒数据。我们纳入了18岁以上的患者,他们在临床或pcr确诊的COVID-19诊断后进行了机械通气。我们将根据患者种族/民族、性别和与机械通气相关的两个护理过程(镇静水平和镇静假期)计算出院时和28天死亡率的描述性统计数据。我们将按种族估计经风险调整的医院水平死亡率差异。我们将使用混合效应逻辑回归和因果中介分析来检验患者种族/民族、机械通气镇静实践和28天死亡率之间的关联,控制合并症、严重程度标志和入院时间,并调整ICU的聚类。结果:在新冠肺炎住院的19626例患者中,238家医院有8668例(14.6%)接受了机械通气。中位年龄62岁(IQR 40-72), 45.1%为女性。在住院患者中,23.3%自认为是西班牙裔,26.6%为非西班牙裔黑人,35.6%为非西班牙裔白人,14.5%为非西班牙裔和其他种族。大约1% (n=236)的患者缺少种族/民族。28天时,20.7% (n= 4076)的住院患者死亡。医院对苯二氮卓类药物的使用高度聚集(类内相关系数为0.63)。在聚类调整分析中,西班牙裔患者比非西班牙裔白人(OR) 0.76, p=0.013)或非西班牙裔黑人(OR 0.70, p=0.003)患者更有可能在住院期间至少接受一次苯二氮卓类药物治疗。多变量混合效应和因果中介分析正在进行中。结论:镇静做法,如镇静水平和镇静假期,与死亡率有关;然而,这些做法可能因患者的种族或民族而异。我们将利用一个独特的、多中心的细粒度临床信息数据库来了解这些差异如何影响呼吸衰竭的种族和民族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信