Automatic Extraction of Opinion-Based Q&A from Online Developer Chats

Preetha Chatterjee, Kostadin Damevski, L. Pollock
{"title":"Automatic Extraction of Opinion-Based Q&A from Online Developer Chats","authors":"Preetha Chatterjee, Kostadin Damevski, L. Pollock","doi":"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual conversational assistants designed specifically for software engineers could have a huge impact on the time it takes for software engineers to get help. Research efforts are focusing on virtual assistants that support specific software development tasks such as bug repair and pair programming. In this paper, we study the use of online chat platforms as a resource towards collecting developer opinions that could potentially help in building opinion Q&A systems, as a specialized instance of virtual assistants and chatbots for software engineers. Opinion Q&A has a stronger presence in chats than in other developer communications, thus mining them can provide a valuable resource for developers in quickly getting insight about a specific development topic (e.g., What is the best Java library for parsing JSON?). We address the problem of opinion Q&A extraction by developing automatic identification of opinion-asking questions and extraction of participants' answers from public online developer chats. We evaluate our automatic approaches on chats spanning six programming communities and two platforms. Our results show that a heuristic approach to opinion-asking questions works well (.87 precision), and a deep learning approach customized to the software domain outperforms heuristics-based, machine-learning-based and deep learning for answer extraction in community question answering.","PeriodicalId":305167,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Virtual conversational assistants designed specifically for software engineers could have a huge impact on the time it takes for software engineers to get help. Research efforts are focusing on virtual assistants that support specific software development tasks such as bug repair and pair programming. In this paper, we study the use of online chat platforms as a resource towards collecting developer opinions that could potentially help in building opinion Q&A systems, as a specialized instance of virtual assistants and chatbots for software engineers. Opinion Q&A has a stronger presence in chats than in other developer communications, thus mining them can provide a valuable resource for developers in quickly getting insight about a specific development topic (e.g., What is the best Java library for parsing JSON?). We address the problem of opinion Q&A extraction by developing automatic identification of opinion-asking questions and extraction of participants' answers from public online developer chats. We evaluate our automatic approaches on chats spanning six programming communities and two platforms. Our results show that a heuristic approach to opinion-asking questions works well (.87 precision), and a deep learning approach customized to the software domain outperforms heuristics-based, machine-learning-based and deep learning for answer extraction in community question answering.
从在线开发人员聊天中自动提取基于意见的问答
专门为软件工程师设计的虚拟会话助手可能会对软件工程师获得帮助所需的时间产生巨大影响。研究工作集中在支持特定软件开发任务的虚拟助手上,比如bug修复和结对编程。在本文中,我们研究了在线聊天平台作为收集开发人员意见的资源的使用,这些意见可能有助于建立意见问答系统,作为软件工程师的虚拟助手和聊天机器人的专门实例。意见问答在聊天中比在其他开发人员交流中更有影响力,因此挖掘它们可以为开发人员提供有价值的资源,帮助他们快速了解特定的开发主题(例如,解析JSON的最佳Java库是什么?)我们通过开发自动识别意见提问问题和从公开的在线开发人员聊天中提取参与者的答案来解决意见问答提取问题。我们在跨越六个编程社区和两个平台的聊天中评估了我们的自动方法。我们的研究结果表明,启发式的意见询问方法效果很好。在社区问题回答中,针对软件领域定制的深度学习方法在答案提取方面优于基于启发式、基于机器学习和深度学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信