'Sacred places, racial homilies': the genesis of the segregated cemetery in Johannesburg, 1886-1909

G. M. Dennie
{"title":"'Sacred places, racial homilies': the genesis of the segregated cemetery in Johannesburg, 1886-1909","authors":"G. M. Dennie","doi":"10.4314/LHR.V10I1.64155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the genesis of racial segregation in Braamfontein Cemetery. I ask, how and why, did the older Judeo-Christian idea of the cemetery as sacred ground, when transported into South Africa, become transmogrified into the idea of the cemetery as racially purified terrain? How indeed did this “racialisation” of consecrated soil affect the codes of mourning in early Johannesburg? And did these changing mortuary practices point to a more profound re-conceptualization of the idea of death, the experience and management of bereavement and grief, and the value and treatment of the dead body in early modern South Africa? Indeed, what is the place of the dead in South Africa and how can we interrogate and locate within the very sanctuaries of the dead the meanings South Africans have attached to the disposal of the dead and the ways in which these have changed under the torrent of the racial conflict in South Africa? To answer these questions the paper draws attention to the city’s first bye-laws and regulations governing the use of Braamfontein Cemetery. These laws were demonstrative of the city’s decision to seek control over the disposal of the dead. The paper explores the development and implementation of the horticultural and landscaping programs in Braamfontein Cemetery and argues that the efforts to sanitize burial, privatize grief, and impose a new aesthetics on the cemetery’s physical appearance represented a profound reconceptualization of the place of the dead leading to the codification of racial segregation in South Africa’s cemeteries.","PeriodicalId":339050,"journal":{"name":"Lagos Historical Review","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lagos Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/LHR.V10I1.64155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper examines the genesis of racial segregation in Braamfontein Cemetery. I ask, how and why, did the older Judeo-Christian idea of the cemetery as sacred ground, when transported into South Africa, become transmogrified into the idea of the cemetery as racially purified terrain? How indeed did this “racialisation” of consecrated soil affect the codes of mourning in early Johannesburg? And did these changing mortuary practices point to a more profound re-conceptualization of the idea of death, the experience and management of bereavement and grief, and the value and treatment of the dead body in early modern South Africa? Indeed, what is the place of the dead in South Africa and how can we interrogate and locate within the very sanctuaries of the dead the meanings South Africans have attached to the disposal of the dead and the ways in which these have changed under the torrent of the racial conflict in South Africa? To answer these questions the paper draws attention to the city’s first bye-laws and regulations governing the use of Braamfontein Cemetery. These laws were demonstrative of the city’s decision to seek control over the disposal of the dead. The paper explores the development and implementation of the horticultural and landscaping programs in Braamfontein Cemetery and argues that the efforts to sanitize burial, privatize grief, and impose a new aesthetics on the cemetery’s physical appearance represented a profound reconceptualization of the place of the dead leading to the codification of racial segregation in South Africa’s cemeteries.
“圣地,种族说教”:1886-1909年约翰内斯堡种族隔离墓地的起源
本文探讨了布拉姆方丹公墓种族隔离的成因。我问,古老的犹太教和基督教认为墓地是神圣之地的观念,在传入南非后,是如何以及为什么变成了把墓地视为种族净化地带的观念?圣土的“种族化”究竟如何影响了约翰内斯堡早期的哀悼准则?这些不断变化的停尸房实践是否表明,在近代早期的南非,人们对死亡的概念、对丧亲之痛的体验和管理,以及对尸体的价值和处理,有了更深刻的重新概念化?的确,死者在南非的位置是什么?我们如何能够在死者的避难所中询问和找出南非人赋予处理死者的意义以及这些意义在南非种族冲突的洪流中发生变化的方式?为了回答这些问题,本文提请注意该市管理Braamfontein公墓使用的第一个附则和法规。这些法律表明,这个城市决定寻求对死者处理的控制权。本文探讨了Braamfontein公墓园艺和景观美化项目的发展和实施,并认为对葬礼进行消毒、将悲伤私有化和对墓地外观施加新美学的努力代表了对死者所在地的深刻重新概念,导致了南非墓地种族隔离的法法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信