A Review of Inconsistencies and Unfounded Assumptions in Physics Enables A Path Forward

W. Oakley
{"title":"A Review of Inconsistencies and Unfounded Assumptions in Physics Enables A Path Forward","authors":"W. Oakley","doi":"10.18689/IJCAA-1000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely recognized significant parts of leading-edge physics are at an impasse. Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate long-standing inconsistencies and assumptions that have become dogma but are erroneous and blocking progress. Newtonʼs gravitational constant GN is assumed a natural constant, having originated via Newtonʼs notion of gravity as radial force acting on mass in flat observer space. But Einstein showed gravity due to curved space time with “mass” dimensionally c2 remote from the observer energy domain. Dirac stated (elementary) particles are “no more than electromagnetic energy localized in observer space”. This suggests gravity is emergent at the particle scale by spacetime curved in three dimensions. But Newtonʼs assumed radial force is consistent only with spacetime curvature in the two dimensions orthogonal to the radial, so how can GN be fundamental? Do the different dimensionalities of Newtonʼs and Einsteinʼs theories relate to the Dark Matter issue? Describing the electron as a photon in a relativistic quantum loop localized by curved spacetime enables derivation of an expression for GN giving a value within the empirical uncertainty. The electron is posited as relativistic electromagnetic energy in dynamic equilibrium between circumferential metric tension at the Strong Force scale and radial electrostatic force, satisfying the Planck “Force Equality” premise. As historically long suspected GN contains a numerical factor of c4, derived from the cgs units, in which it was first measured, and a relativistic factor, α-4/3, which move the Planck scale into exact correspondence with the electron parameters. General Relativity is shown a fundamental femto-scale theory where the strong force in a metric curved at the particle scale is manifest in observer space reduced by the classical “Large Number” of 5.7x1044 and is evident as gravity. The expression obtained for GN is supported by deriving the MOND constant and the observed flat galactic star rotation velocity curves. Resolving identified erroneous assumptions and inconsistencies will significantly impact cosmology and particle physics and bring gravitational and electromagnetic unification closer.","PeriodicalId":192286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cosmology, Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"291 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cosmology, Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18689/IJCAA-1000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely recognized significant parts of leading-edge physics are at an impasse. Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate long-standing inconsistencies and assumptions that have become dogma but are erroneous and blocking progress. Newtonʼs gravitational constant GN is assumed a natural constant, having originated via Newtonʼs notion of gravity as radial force acting on mass in flat observer space. But Einstein showed gravity due to curved space time with “mass” dimensionally c2 remote from the observer energy domain. Dirac stated (elementary) particles are “no more than electromagnetic energy localized in observer space”. This suggests gravity is emergent at the particle scale by spacetime curved in three dimensions. But Newtonʼs assumed radial force is consistent only with spacetime curvature in the two dimensions orthogonal to the radial, so how can GN be fundamental? Do the different dimensionalities of Newtonʼs and Einsteinʼs theories relate to the Dark Matter issue? Describing the electron as a photon in a relativistic quantum loop localized by curved spacetime enables derivation of an expression for GN giving a value within the empirical uncertainty. The electron is posited as relativistic electromagnetic energy in dynamic equilibrium between circumferential metric tension at the Strong Force scale and radial electrostatic force, satisfying the Planck “Force Equality” premise. As historically long suspected GN contains a numerical factor of c4, derived from the cgs units, in which it was first measured, and a relativistic factor, α-4/3, which move the Planck scale into exact correspondence with the electron parameters. General Relativity is shown a fundamental femto-scale theory where the strong force in a metric curved at the particle scale is manifest in observer space reduced by the classical “Large Number” of 5.7x1044 and is evident as gravity. The expression obtained for GN is supported by deriving the MOND constant and the observed flat galactic star rotation velocity curves. Resolving identified erroneous assumptions and inconsistencies will significantly impact cosmology and particle physics and bring gravitational and electromagnetic unification closer.
回顾物理学中的矛盾和毫无根据的假设,使我们能够前进
人们普遍认为,前沿物理学的重要部分陷入了僵局。也许现在是时候重新评估长期以来的矛盾和假设,这些已经成为教条,但却是错误的,阻碍了进步。牛顿的引力常数GN被假定为一个自然常数,它起源于牛顿的引力概念,即在平坦的观察者空间中作用于质量的径向力。但爱因斯坦证明了引力是由于弯曲的时空,其“质量”维度为c2,远离观察者的能量域。狄拉克说(基本)粒子“只不过是定位于观察者空间的电磁能”。这表明,引力在粒子尺度上是由三维弯曲的时空产生的。但是牛顿假设的径向力只与与径向正交的二维时空曲率一致,那么GN怎么可能是基本的呢?牛顿和爱因斯坦理论的不同维度与暗物质问题有关吗?将电子描述为由弯曲时空局域化的相对论性量子环中的光子,可以推导出GN的表达式,给出经验不确定性范围内的值。假设电子为相对论电磁能,在强力尺度下处于周向度规张力与径向静电力的动态平衡状态,满足普朗克“力相等”前提。正如历史上长期怀疑的那样,GN包含了一个数值因子c4,来自于它第一次被测量的cgs单位,以及一个相对论因子α-4/3,它使普朗克尺度与电子参数精确对应。广义相对论被证明是一个基本的飞尺度理论,其中在粒子尺度上的度量曲线中的强作用力在观察者空间中被经典的5.7x1044“大数”所缩小,并且作为重力表现出来。通过推导MOND常数和观测到的平坦星系恒星旋转速度曲线,支持了GN的表达式。解决已确定的错误假设和不一致将对宇宙学和粒子物理学产生重大影响,并使引力和电磁更接近统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信