‘I try to be true to myself but other people have to fit you into a box’: Exploring how voluntarily childfree women discursively negotiate their sense of self in a pronatalist society

Ruth Hutchinson
{"title":"‘I try to be true to myself but other people have to fit you into a box’: Exploring how voluntarily childfree women discursively negotiate their sense of self in a pronatalist society","authors":"Ruth Hutchinson","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2022.5.2.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women who have consciously remained free of having children, also known as voluntarily childfree (Blackstone, 2019), occupy liminal spaces created for them by dominant social discourses that valorise reproduction and vilify childfreedom (Gotlib, 2016). Reproductive desire is socially constructed as biologically innate (Franke, 2010) and pronatalist discourses construct voluntarily childfree (VC) women as making an ‘unnatural’ choice (Gillespie, 2003). This research aims to explore how socially constructed positions about voluntarily childfree women have impacted their sense of self. Feminist Relational Discourse Analysis (Thompson et al., 2018) was used to listen for contrapuntal voices within VC women’s negotiation of identities. Through semi-structured interviews with six women, three prominent discourses were heard: Negotiating Identity in a Pronatalist Society; Still Being a Woman Whilst Not Being a Mother; and Political Implications of Being Voluntarily Childfree. Contrapuntal voices heard within these discourses highlighted that VC women skilfully negotiate complex and conflicting subject positions to create space for their identities as women. The complex nature of VC women’s subjective experience of selfhood serves as a challenge to the homogenised view of women’s identity perpetuated by the patriarchal discourses prevalent in political structures of social policies, healthcare and workplace settings.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"886 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2022.5.2.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women who have consciously remained free of having children, also known as voluntarily childfree (Blackstone, 2019), occupy liminal spaces created for them by dominant social discourses that valorise reproduction and vilify childfreedom (Gotlib, 2016). Reproductive desire is socially constructed as biologically innate (Franke, 2010) and pronatalist discourses construct voluntarily childfree (VC) women as making an ‘unnatural’ choice (Gillespie, 2003). This research aims to explore how socially constructed positions about voluntarily childfree women have impacted their sense of self. Feminist Relational Discourse Analysis (Thompson et al., 2018) was used to listen for contrapuntal voices within VC women’s negotiation of identities. Through semi-structured interviews with six women, three prominent discourses were heard: Negotiating Identity in a Pronatalist Society; Still Being a Woman Whilst Not Being a Mother; and Political Implications of Being Voluntarily Childfree. Contrapuntal voices heard within these discourses highlighted that VC women skilfully negotiate complex and conflicting subject positions to create space for their identities as women. The complex nature of VC women’s subjective experience of selfhood serves as a challenge to the homogenised view of women’s identity perpetuated by the patriarchal discourses prevalent in political structures of social policies, healthcare and workplace settings.
“我试着做真实的自己,但其他人必须把你放进一个盒子里”:探索在一个亲生主义的社会里,自愿不生孩子的女性如何用话语来协商自己的自我意识
有意识地保持不生孩子的女性,也被称为自愿不生孩子(Blackstone, 2019),占据了主流社会话语为她们创造的有限空间,这些话语重视生育和诋毁孩子自由(Gotlib, 2016)。生殖欲望被社会建构为生理先天(Franke, 2010),而先天主义话语将自愿无子女(VC)的女性建构为做出“不自然”的选择(Gillespie, 2003)。本研究旨在探讨自愿不生育妇女的社会建构立场如何影响她们的自我意识。女性主义关系话语分析(Thompson et al., 2018)用于倾听VC女性身份谈判中的对位声音。通过对六位女性的半结构化访谈,我们听到了三个突出的话语:在一个亲身主义社会中协商身份;不做母亲,还是个女人;以及自愿无子女的政治含义。在这些话语中听到的对位的声音强调了风险投资女性巧妙地处理复杂和冲突的主题立场,为她们作为女性的身份创造空间。风险投资女性对自我的主观体验的复杂性,是对女性身份同质化观点的挑战,这种同质化观点是由社会政策、医疗保健和工作场所等政治结构中普遍存在的父权话语所延续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信