Enhancing Automatic Reasoning of human errors in an operating system using fuzzy logic

K. Chrysafiadi, M. Virvou
{"title":"Enhancing Automatic Reasoning of human errors in an operating system using fuzzy logic","authors":"K. Chrysafiadi, M. Virvou","doi":"10.1109/IISA.2019.8900775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a novel fuzzy mechanism for automatic reasoning of human errors in operating systems is presented. The presented mechanism combines Human Plausible Reasoning (HPR) theory with fuzzy logic. HPR is used for inferring the commands the user of an operating system should have type and fuzzy logic is used to handle the uncertainty that characterizes the complex reasoning process by modelling the errors’ types in a more realistic way. Particularly, the output of HPR theory guesses all the possible command that the user may wants to type. These guesses can include many types of errors varying from typographic to wrong use of a legal command. In the presented mechanism, these guesses are input in a fuzzy reasoner, which takes into account the needs, characteristics and misconceptions of each individual user and decides about the most appropriate explanation of user’s error and gives personalized advice that fits better in each context and situation. The mechanism has been applied on the sub-domain of file manipulation of UNIX. The potential of the presented mechanism to reason about operating system’s users’ slips and misconceptions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":371385,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","volume":"22 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2019.8900775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper a novel fuzzy mechanism for automatic reasoning of human errors in operating systems is presented. The presented mechanism combines Human Plausible Reasoning (HPR) theory with fuzzy logic. HPR is used for inferring the commands the user of an operating system should have type and fuzzy logic is used to handle the uncertainty that characterizes the complex reasoning process by modelling the errors’ types in a more realistic way. Particularly, the output of HPR theory guesses all the possible command that the user may wants to type. These guesses can include many types of errors varying from typographic to wrong use of a legal command. In the presented mechanism, these guesses are input in a fuzzy reasoner, which takes into account the needs, characteristics and misconceptions of each individual user and decides about the most appropriate explanation of user’s error and gives personalized advice that fits better in each context and situation. The mechanism has been applied on the sub-domain of file manipulation of UNIX. The potential of the presented mechanism to reason about operating system’s users’ slips and misconceptions are discussed.
利用模糊逻辑增强操作系统中人为错误的自动推理
本文提出了一种用于操作系统人为错误自动推理的模糊机制。该机制将人类似是而非的推理理论与模糊逻辑相结合。HPR用于推断操作系统用户应该具有的命令类型,模糊逻辑用于处理复杂推理过程的不确定性,通过以更现实的方式建模错误类型。特别是,HPR理论的输出猜测了用户可能想要输入的所有可能的命令。这些猜测可能包括多种类型的错误,从排版到错误地使用合法命令。在本文提出的机制中,这些猜测被输入到一个模糊推理器中,该推理器考虑每个用户的需求、特征和误解,决定对用户错误的最合适的解释,并给出更适合每种上下文和情况的个性化建议。该机制已应用于UNIX的文件操作子域。讨论了所提出的机制对操作系统用户的错误和误解进行推理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信